 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员' y4 V. x6 E6 \; u# C8 {8 V
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
' Y' D( N% J, _, d4 L- P% s
" O7 v% ?$ ?4 y( b8 X4 k. y+ l$ IEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.% n. _5 [2 f, z, O, M# \- n
0 e# h" O; ]0 Q% C2 [Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
& U. Z; |! s+ g1 W; p. d1 O
' l7 x1 Q' v% W5 v& `7 j1 J7 ?The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.9 e7 ~* B. q% I7 U' P+ Q/ f+ D1 r
- Z( I0 y4 a2 MDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
8 \& H- X8 R' T. U9 R% ~
e6 s! K, u) H& {# XDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
% `. d6 G% j1 l f6 P
& s7 u: Q* H) c+ o+ p! b# c HDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
6 c4 N1 r" `' T- X# [# O+ x& r
Z: _" o) L3 C! wDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.8 d1 P9 v: e* ?# e0 M0 w1 E
R# Z3 q0 u4 dPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
7 ?0 J' F. ^8 l3 P$ e ^: m7 T( s: g/ s- T' I
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|