 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
$ ~: B, o8 A6 S9 WDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
' I1 Z3 x+ a: | g' r. {* ?! s: D7 I6 v9 @) p- z! X
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
6 u- N/ y% \) O ^; _2 V% N5 @* z/ N; m1 m! o9 V7 Q$ c
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. + ?; { O' ?% G- ?0 K- ^
6 E; D! s( A1 e) j0 r' |The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
/ o/ \# E$ \1 V1 d7 t
0 A( t. J1 p% y7 w$ UDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer., C- Q+ A x: f0 i, e$ q3 m8 D( J
2 c- t) Z# g5 gDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
# g) H6 b8 A/ M7 D8 q ]. N( w& K8 Z. E5 g% D b7 n' J2 w
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
9 O" i3 B4 j' U
9 \- O* b5 e7 u/ {Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.( {1 G; N3 E) P4 a. i2 ~$ U H0 r
" C0 a! s& l* N! Q3 YPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.1 t$ K, A, a1 s, |4 q( G# t- I
' P. N n0 F: T' ~* E9 M0 {
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|