 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员, v2 \) c5 X; O3 @! t" R
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
% J* L: t8 k- i( @- D4 g, E
# U8 Y, t. o wEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
n( g! o* H7 m1 G: L0 I+ n
4 }; N3 e- {4 Q9 IMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
" E) M. u2 Z0 ?( D5 N2 d( B! q- ?. B' y% Q* G" j5 C; q9 Z
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.; t3 I. g* }% \) i6 G8 b3 j" P
/ F& r s& `- O5 v+ }
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.8 s& Y7 p, t/ w& A8 c2 V8 }, d
3 }) e' |7 v' d( \! j E7 [3 K
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.. k: A! C/ O2 D) W" W! t8 q9 e
% R. ^* {/ s: ^0 ]% H2 H/ F ?' S
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
% B$ m# y" L- y! m, F( W$ x! J% r; A, Q0 u J
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
2 u7 y. O7 Y2 Q/ \; ~# e2 R$ z; y3 c8 h' e X6 u
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
! v: X- ]9 }2 X) |
3 G9 W7 W' T2 N/ I, V) C9 oDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|