 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
- \. \( J/ O/ k7 N" [2 FDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
- ?! d" j* d" U8 J" G2 D* _; G2 R/ ?5 j
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
7 z$ O% C, n6 T J. I" S4 M4 M- C& w1 V% C/ X0 f% {4 v. _
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. w* ~; y" C$ \( i( W
5 V# Y: B3 b7 V8 x4 I/ Z8 ?The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
; T1 X3 Y) n9 K/ Y& w( T! D, L% L
$ D" _# D# \3 G: c6 z6 ?6 iDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.3 }/ f+ b& Y- }& O' F, E8 N% M
6 E+ o8 L1 M% o* [# V( IDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.6 h( T" N! s# |1 e8 ~. z i
3 ]0 q f2 i7 ~% _$ R( @1 T
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.1 c& S$ E+ q- |# [
/ [. _- u$ V$ N4 G
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.; k2 |- A. ?, {( R) o/ r
9 F0 I: [% q7 t: h1 C4 x; @' B
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.; u/ O, M$ T5 H- h7 l. l; J9 ^
* `' R# S0 b$ Y. h
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|