 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员9 `* c- h2 X+ [. }/ c( p
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
' r, x9 m" X4 G+ o2 |$ n% U e( I1 W; Z; ]7 m1 {0 I7 ~
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
' G8 i6 j2 Q% T7 o, K4 C9 Z9 S+ _% G" P: W
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
7 \8 ^1 U/ Z1 \) ^5 L- K5 Y% b; H) }/ k1 g; e, N
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
- E' s% a6 v- E
) k1 D; i5 R: P7 h6 l. Q% E6 ?3 YDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.* |5 M, G+ G# ^7 b. h, d3 w
+ z8 W4 ~& s3 G4 r2 o% B& ~
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.$ N9 [! D$ X9 ?% b$ L' e, G
/ y8 _" E2 G# \ bDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
% W4 @% p/ e) i6 l- f) r* w4 w1 r! p6 e3 p; ^+ L
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction./ B. s3 N2 ^1 ]6 Z& I# c$ x! g$ { q
4 f4 U$ W% e$ O1 `1 K* \! u& Z9 B
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
E0 J& B) t7 \2 o7 I; o* `4 d O
7 Q3 D7 u2 Y1 \. x0 Z( CDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|