 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
' |" [" v% w# u5 g/ Hfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove7 M% o g5 }- ^2 k N
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
+ Q5 ^% p: H; I2 V1 N3 Zprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
8 ]$ {2 _6 S& ]$ Y$ pfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This5 O$ o/ \% l$ J. R" j' ?7 c: F
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction! |3 d- _5 {6 M) ?' {* _! o
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately; u" |6 R% Q |( y! i$ V! `: ?
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past2 R9 H% a, n3 G& ]1 d$ n; [
three years.
$ p9 m R; T. z- k' ?By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from3 { J3 E+ u5 y
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of" @' B! a8 X6 ~7 v
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects& J# x7 [' l8 ^- F. j/ F* Q/ h- T( @
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
0 i! o! {! G/ i# E5 w& zto fundamentally justified levels.2 H# m0 L2 {8 Q; W
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
3 W8 @7 h9 r* w5 b; h* A# Iwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and- r5 l" f2 \3 z, y1 K; K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
6 [/ W( \, X% r8 fwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
: ]9 ~4 ]6 g- V& Z1 Athere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
3 e5 u( y7 z. P% S( L" O“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
& A* L5 k( y% Uhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
+ D( b. B- ?+ q- Q0 `+ Vthat is now being rapidly reined in.
- `1 a$ o8 Z* Q; IWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,3 I/ r/ U9 _: h' K
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
d) @" e: j9 e1 V9 |9 _means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
/ U& W6 g! R) T9 [1 X! { z% o" c, \on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers, I; y0 ?7 X9 a1 d
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
0 J; E: \' f, e& a0 G+ sremain choppy and new residential construction will be
1 d7 ^* }0 c( h2 }dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
, L" V4 n1 m6 n7 b9 Fis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
6 U6 P3 O3 e9 P) K8 Mto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide) ]2 C% I" m: d$ y! x
residential construction will fall further to around0 }+ c8 m' u4 l0 R9 n5 a7 S; |
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units; @0 b* m4 @' x' `/ E1 R
in the fourth quarter./ n$ J0 c0 X- Y" u& @
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
# D: q" U/ T4 L0 r( B8 b& Jwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
$ v: t r' m7 n+ S- |fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
4 S7 j4 O# Y; p: G6 t+ C/ Sprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home. k9 Y& u4 C6 I1 D$ V
values since house prices should track incomes over the
1 {, w; f3 l0 p# t* glong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
, @$ l; p4 S4 A p% Uregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers7 c# L! Z" u# x f0 P
of residential construction.
2 o3 N" C5 e- c' ]" dTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
8 U8 v' z: F7 D# M, M' r“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
% m; V" b. g8 vwould have occurred if housing had been priced
$ s- w4 T! [; I8 Joptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
& P7 h% J1 f0 K0 {fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
6 ?( v9 k, i) L8 g Munits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
5 Z+ } J4 C/ `many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
' [" T+ {3 G) Q) ]* T' [Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* ]. j$ X2 }: Z/ a1 K
where housing demand will further contract under waning) X I& V) r% t" V8 K+ ]
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are: b, x( o0 D8 k3 j1 K2 j
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the3 X' A, G4 ~$ u/ }$ _: B8 s2 p, d
very time that the resale market has swung into strong. x2 i/ c" Q( y! |
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces8 b! ?. g: h+ f/ l3 ^0 Z
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural3 n5 O) a2 g4 h9 d1 B9 P1 z+ H
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
2 l! S, K8 o# b" N/ DQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
$ J! W9 u# P( Nstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
: [- I8 \$ V+ i& VMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,0 f+ K/ {: R4 N! k: U* I9 n
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
( q F8 |. D! M! d& trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a4 ^3 B8 o, x$ Z8 T5 c
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
( _5 @' C2 e% ?$ u; r) tlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
$ B3 \9 g* V+ d7 C5 v4 {condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
7 x, h- \; H& o h; Y7 B, G3 phigh levels of apartment-style units presently under8 m; q! }1 \3 j; ~) s7 s
construction mean that record numbers of condos will+ F# i1 M$ q& y5 h6 Y3 c
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
4 V, a( C* [; m4 q% d, icyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
% v C% \& L1 Z B$ Sspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
. t6 D1 U, i. k8 bresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we- J& c. N; M* Q1 w6 d9 ~8 _
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- N% a+ I" Z; H& \1 winter-provincial and international migration over the coming3 W( @+ A6 J$ R6 w) W/ X( S
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,: F9 Q4 K' ^0 @ J
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
6 K/ K# B# C# @$ `5 vOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
8 F' _4 D3 x) c, m; D4 G. tMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS% u/ U; K8 n9 }1 v
Grant Bishop, Economist
3 B0 t; k& w+ t) e5 f416-982-8063 c/ q0 s6 \5 }7 [
Pascal Gauthier, Economist2 w$ G* t) G* h8 ~, C
416-944-5730
' ?% {# _. e9 D! k7 z( k5 j4 l9 w3 d, w% b
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|