 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
& y3 t, n1 Z4 K$ s( ^+ Afrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
R/ i! ^# d6 g) x& _; qunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house' p% }, y. G4 N: \" X3 J4 H( w$ f3 @
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
; L! [! g: T& bfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* D/ p, v6 A& S2 J. a6 U' Boverpricing compelled a level of residential construction# o4 K2 C, F& X# c9 D- M
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
% y0 ?* h1 f% @$ k! v& y12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past. O2 Q. i9 C$ b; V! `0 k
three years.( x' V2 x- y3 ~* m" O
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
" M* r; A# R7 p2 l1 N) J( }their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of) L8 O4 m- L0 s- t, c8 T0 d! ]
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
& S% C! K' r( H+ h3 U: Hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices! }, Q9 @9 ~8 L. v
to fundamentally justified levels.
; R2 x* ]# {+ y! b9 x6 i) ^We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”8 t# y; J! U$ n3 s
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and) ~- x1 t# U! G" ?" a7 x
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
6 Z7 D+ C T! E; B0 z) Wwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although: e ^; _/ w- r% c0 A& x1 B- u
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s `( U$ o' q( h( \( u( X
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where% p- d8 t6 W: z# s1 @8 R* v( }' y
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch7 ~- z5 G i: o0 r
that is now being rapidly reined in.5 [; e8 l5 d6 b i
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,7 g6 Q8 p! A! f7 C
the construction of too many new homes over the boom+ h5 T6 E3 Q. e) m$ n
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh# D9 I3 g5 m# `
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
! B6 [9 w5 \2 H$ |, Nfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" C4 ^4 M2 L+ W! w# @remain choppy and new residential construction will be/ Y4 t9 ~) f8 m, S2 v
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
: w+ Q: _* w: \4 Vis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this9 c2 s E$ R L' M" N% M5 v
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide, l8 G7 R( q7 I. u
residential construction will fall further to around4 h k2 H: e+ |/ v- r& e
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units. z5 i, Y6 s3 H! S; q, c0 a
in the fourth quarter.
3 L# }( f8 Q3 p; E- `To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding, D5 d3 `" V; o4 N1 o [. n
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run0 T; e5 U& p% {+ s0 M' A# j
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each8 a: Q$ K$ O. {
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home9 \% X, e( R5 _+ @0 F9 `
values since house prices should track incomes over the4 o# n" K4 P1 n+ o
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
* E% A: {; z! bregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers2 n9 n B* Q) d$ e; I
of residential construction.
, @/ }% |# \5 h: H* j# }% T* N/ J" hTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
# r+ i8 E# l* `7 I2 c0 j% a. c“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
6 v @' K6 W5 f. f; Awould have occurred if housing had been priced! j/ Z9 w, ~+ |; ~, z: e) a' c' ]* e4 E8 H
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
+ T3 K1 A7 U4 @0 C5 yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 m' z: B5 E) u( x" M; \units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too h0 |# g! k( t6 ~, ?6 z' s1 L
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.4 f) F+ r3 _; ]1 Y& \/ W: |
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,8 b8 @- }( g* G, I7 v
where housing demand will further contract under waning
1 ]) z1 ^' C. M& s( y/ m8 jpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are. t+ C0 c1 M1 @1 x; P U+ N) [( z
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
* D/ |& R7 T- Jvery time that the resale market has swung into strong4 ^! F9 w( u7 i
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces$ L6 s H0 `- h/ @; O: N! `( J. s$ N6 w
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
% \# C( h" S. ?& Fweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
! \& _7 U# W0 Z+ o2 U2 y9 w8 t/ s' |1 O7 MQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the: X1 s$ N$ o% f: d j8 l
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de3 L' o" x2 i2 i) ]- ^; k- x9 L
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,. d8 @5 x1 r$ @+ e9 j
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership6 S6 Q/ i% V' m5 Y( K
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
2 b0 [# z) T+ Ucyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' K, b; T9 m% H/ Q( @limited – with the important exception of the Toronto" {5 f: u2 W& @" O7 l! F
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically. [9 I: o& P$ z# g
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
- n% v$ j' x! p; e* a4 B% yconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will3 _' b! k" V5 _! |' E
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as5 L9 O8 G0 D s, _* S! n- V5 q" }
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
7 Z6 m1 u7 E6 {' `spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while3 [3 G5 X# V6 h2 _
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
6 ?4 C/ _' v, Banticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
: H' T8 m5 c2 l9 ~6 [6 I6 qinter-provincial and international migration over the coming& c9 i# ~7 p6 W5 b; c
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,7 t. x4 o V( |: ~( T& B) x7 u
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
E* i; e( X* ~! eOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING l" n; U( f& R9 I. z6 J
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS- g3 s) y8 O+ l( x! [! v6 S) q
Grant Bishop, Economist
9 W8 q5 [9 N+ T416-982-8063
" Z# u; v' o6 _Pascal Gauthier, Economist
& E% p( b! d I416-944-5730
- d. l: B4 Y+ q4 J1 r3 p2 T+ j4 K' j* U8 E$ i
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|