 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly2 y0 _! N8 V; K. c5 n- Y8 L
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove9 O0 E5 _8 M m/ N
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
" h8 V; S- P6 Tprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ D1 `. G5 J4 m- L/ b$ b; A1 V2 W x
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
% {% N+ X9 @ P6 H/ u; moverpricing compelled a level of residential construction; X7 b% s v( m. K( x, n5 g
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
) s, @$ }; x$ {; R, v3 f. X. p12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 T9 ^' [: Z; z) q) y
three years.' a7 S3 F) R" z& k2 W* c3 ?
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from: J' F& Z! @! m. s, w) ]3 [- O6 ^
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
" O; w* w8 a; S! s8 ]affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects b7 B1 u9 m7 e
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices( P! q# F) c+ q/ Z( b3 u9 \/ O
to fundamentally justified levels.% f( i4 g! K$ [& [/ Q/ u# s
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
: V" r1 E$ I7 l8 V+ F) Gwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and% W( [6 g: ^$ A/ _
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
: w& Q) M: W2 m- e. U9 ~4 _where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although2 H* p9 |: O- j& G/ w+ o2 c
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
0 K# n& u4 o3 ~' _# `( ?1 d“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. W9 C, O. l7 m3 b+ c5 ^homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch3 T8 D. s$ a/ d( M# e' ~
that is now being rapidly reined in.
$ P* I4 `$ n5 g8 \0 b8 _While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,2 F; O2 o6 @% N" N0 M% L! }
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
2 i% O4 V- e6 Fmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
1 H. O' h* Y) k2 fon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
5 w7 q- o3 q, [9 k6 Z- |$ M1 ]from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will: `1 q' ~- z/ I4 W) z2 `
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
l9 P! j3 D# A- E# j4 e/ Adampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction, O T' y; }5 S# R$ z( @
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this# R3 ]5 o7 N6 B+ n r
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 }: d' {8 g) h( {
residential construction will fall further to around* H& S2 q& Z. c: ^" X! x
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
& O6 x) S3 n9 h9 s6 a; g/ iin the fourth quarter.) r, J- f* R) P4 i! F+ U! O- v, I% `- O
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,( p- e0 B3 X& `/ Q, ]0 `
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run4 ~; U, J& N$ O5 W B1 i
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each. O7 z: C: u N# E9 F
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
; b# O& A' J! o& g* b5 K; K1 Zvalues since house prices should track incomes over the3 f5 c9 U" a [$ O6 m
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
- T. x! m; P9 ]regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers$ `& L6 u5 I: P
of residential construction.
( z" }4 X& {/ J# X0 q# O' q9 eTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! `; H! @) _7 Z/ ]" N! ~: J) g
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
( N5 V2 T8 N7 O6 Bwould have occurred if housing had been priced+ I5 |6 B- n( V1 \! W' I0 S
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
?/ c# ?1 F8 W& O# Z* }fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
) Z. o) q3 Q5 P6 S) S y3 [$ O6 [units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too5 v! ?7 T& m9 o7 C- g! R' t3 [
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.5 W4 P( q& }; V7 ]* [/ ?
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,2 m1 Q y& n+ n0 [6 I4 h8 }5 m
where housing demand will further contract under waning' b! e/ u d+ L4 I
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are5 c) Z5 A; S& \3 f- R) w6 x) H
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the; v. `* ?8 D0 j$ ~& p% \
very time that the resale market has swung into strong" V/ ^; k/ X) I8 q2 Y
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
: {5 e/ r7 Q. T1 \1 @has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
3 `1 r! b2 `. }# V: q5 Dweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.: C0 T) T) E/ K5 J" z! Z3 }4 N
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the+ Q" E. ?0 A% n4 M) Y# d b7 d
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de: T" Y1 ]/ R5 ]& Z" a2 ?! s! C
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,( Y. j& i7 O5 k. [# ~9 x8 V
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
/ q: H; M" U1 t! t, L5 h/ n; ^) L$ grates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a; `' m' B7 ]# v
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears) n/ p& B' o9 V
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
$ j8 U7 C7 r; J( r3 _! Q {. qcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
) E- i; \+ @& E7 z* ^# Zhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
$ K/ L) P6 s; e' }construction mean that record numbers of condos will
; N! l1 E( i) t" p4 Qreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
% Y) u6 j; ~% C+ o7 u7 p5 C( Scyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
$ L& |: ~/ ~* ?' [: T" `) Vspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while* u% Y S* [7 m6 ?+ v7 H
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# n9 S* n. ?% s' j4 b
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# j/ f! W- M; Y2 H0 I4 J/ x
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming2 b6 B7 p1 ^! R4 ]3 E5 ^4 b: z
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,* F- M5 P8 l8 [0 C
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding." r: X0 y- X8 F8 m6 |1 u; U: Y
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING2 O# @3 X! l. m% @8 S2 A+ c. _
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
/ [ `- c: Q. G: k, J, y4 Q) `Grant Bishop, Economist" N* ], B8 d+ Q( {5 g: V% O8 e! D
416-982-8063
) w/ ?& [$ _# Q6 ]9 T; aPascal Gauthier, Economist
% ~$ a$ {. @) `+ N- d416-944-5730# s% q9 F2 r* F+ ?* I" J. b2 u! o# b
9 F1 U$ A+ y/ V- H+ j9 s% lhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|