6#cactus_2009 ' e& {: N# a# l+ w! ~: e ( u6 K# M/ a t% e7 EThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 : P3 ^4 k. b( h$ W$ i: `- ~# g
6 O4 b2 b8 T2 ]5 c3 |: V' s$ y
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ...: T3 t4 ?7 N! R8 y* r' Z
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
; X( F; M' ~; f
" J0 R0 h- D' O9 m* `7 |' S: wSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? $ z+ {: r6 a) v8 S2 L1 F! ~特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
& c2 `3 n$ b% B! c. |I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.