/ G0 U+ l/ a/ G# \5 c. @
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.# i$ U7 s. |/ g ?* T |
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.* R3 K4 S+ f/ G8 q3 C' U
1 o2 \% Z" z: U- n$ ~3 Q: m5 T
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?. p. L, e$ k% H- p( b
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.9 { ?/ `# W: w5 v- @
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.( b3 I) U! Y2 `& w3 a
3 Z. o- n3 G# c; a c, C 6 T" h' F" k/ R5 d " x9 L' m! f, \# [- R, [. w' s) L0 h& S/ @/ @2 F
4 L o% i I0 A
3 e) r- ?8 g; S8 x4 W
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
# A. r& _2 W- H* w
# D1 a' R" U! c* o: L+ N没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,' h4 j$ j6 V* [0 `6 o
: t7 c# c. ~% x: n但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实( Z, X& N$ b' v& d! h: ~! r% @
6 f3 E; t( L" d E记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则