 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
4 S+ I- e9 D0 ~: D3 ?- b6 x& w: X) q) r) s: V. R
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
; x! ?) _: p- o4 M. J8 m7 u' U- c, j9 |0 w! l$ {6 ~* b& t( P0 v
**********************************; T4 [ G B9 |! W! N' L. F
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
& C. t' I3 w" [0 m" V8 Z1 Q$ Z9 w; ^+ G e' A r; W* B
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
( U1 |( j3 B8 e- J7 b' ~: x
& I: `/ x1 }* Z3 f+ R- l2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
, q0 E+ W, \8 a# K' o7 r0 e; z* e, M" A9 O! T
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4., K7 G: p) ?8 z% x% ^. D8 O
6 s; P e# l/ l$ j# g3 x! t
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
+ g b5 }# f O1 Z: g$ D! D1 u& |
$ y0 ^$ x: N: e: T! z/ z5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|