 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
$ ~7 H! ]8 v! }; l- L: G) X% X7 a- c% G5 w
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
1 H8 p! v1 X9 y5 o3 n
, d' W+ s9 s/ R# [1 r**********************************
" T$ L. D7 e0 B3 LAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
& R( j' a* c- o8 I6 x7 c, g% \ v) w
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
' g9 _/ ], _! C2 O O2 K
. G8 u9 Q4 R! S) I2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
! z8 _) P9 }0 c! d. |+ k" R/ M% y
8 ?- T! p3 y5 t" E3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
& n8 e$ M( ~. T9 R3 Y! t+ {' L% D
2 M. M8 o+ F i& u4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.+ B3 N0 ]6 l* Z; v0 I; W
) T$ o/ r/ ?, h& r5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|