请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
% @/ r4 Z( Z' w7 L5 X
% g1 A2 S" H" b, ?2 h( I+ m, S值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
$ y- g1 Z+ |: p
1 D, X% O- w$ _" u5 F* v* }, l4 w值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

( [  L: ?5 C+ t+ e2 b( ?0 t0 I眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
9 Z- S5 C6 _" a" W% h. X% [5 vTax Roll: 9982751
3 X; \: n& j& a- T: wAssessed Value: $497,000
2 G6 z# C; f' a; b3 S5 S100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
+ d5 \0 J9 c8 u# wProperty Type: Residential
) X5 v- |( b! D. d/ ^Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
  d# q2 `% S3 B9 z. ?Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
7 |; g1 q% N% M& LApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
* W3 |- a; s& r* n: G# q- f; fBasement Development: No
1 G. }) J" J1 n% [( x/ Z2 IGarage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
1 s% |# b/ v6 Q# y) DWalkout Basement: No
1 E5 R# T  {0 }* \0 U3 z: ~7 c+ q  bAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
5 Z& d7 j5 B7 u8 S& T- }! @
/ q1 Q/ l; X! J3 ^2 t' {you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.