请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
. S3 ^' [( f7 H7 J: k/ C# z, g
# _5 Q9 `2 w( ]$ o) z# h) f值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
/ q0 a) z$ f: G1 M' A% M( g
值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

; e  n8 V3 T" k0 R去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
. \! o+ o) Q3 S. jAssessed Value: $497,000
" a6 r- {- B" t9 Z9 B, C100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
) i5 ?% ^6 H2 _6 A" A  WNeighbourhood: Richford
+ a8 @; s! z9 Y% h! [" dProperty Type: Residential
( \+ \0 r0 W8 A$ V: tLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
! c3 z# O6 O' `4 X; nBuilding Count: 1
) Y$ F' R" }/ @$ bYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
% o: J1 O! T- b2 i. ^! {! rApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
Garage: Yes
  N8 @2 _! a0 _5 q) i" QFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
0 S+ D+ `7 t" P$ F8 j7 D  O, f
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.