 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 4 @1 g& O5 c8 ~6 ~4 Y" M
% B$ \* [: L$ g) }
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 O% e6 i0 f: G3 D
1 R: f6 ?' ^4 I. I) B TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& E; v5 n! r \
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third. F0 _! T4 ^- e: x1 p% s: `
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic# u9 R, q# D8 ], _7 Y& e, A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! R5 t$ N* R% l( Y, |price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and8 x' f+ ^$ s- @3 Y6 G( k, }; D
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: e2 o* `' M6 m0 J2 g; s9 n) MQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal$ I- \- r# P. ]
LePage Real Estate Services.
( d7 y. T. @5 \& B0 m3 G6 d7 Q
, p3 C; f6 w* V' t; A$ a0 c Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters7 s- p0 k/ W& M" [( q( o6 z a! |5 s
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic6 ~; c5 q: z- _5 o: p5 ]. w
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and( P% }$ o( Y( n
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ T8 Y u s' H' {" zresidential real estate sector.; K: E H: \) w2 i2 G4 _* B$ s" }
8 Z. E; g9 U9 V9 u; F/ c
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 U3 y, I4 ]& @, _9 xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% s1 K3 U& F7 t H. p/ n3 L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* Y) A) [3 a2 J" W( F
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( Q6 K' A1 j% m4 N
(+13.2%).
0 M9 B J3 r' @4 N2 z6 ?% \& L9 c6 ` \& C" ~& [) G
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ W2 H1 t! c) H7 @% _) F4 V1 S" gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the6 \) Q$ N" R. E! D! S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 K5 c; W" g- |
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 Z! s2 @" ]2 k+ N. F5 x1 |
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. q+ i1 F! K! r* z1 z# J9 R* P' \
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 V5 J j( Z8 V# w! R0 r! I) ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy5 _2 N) i9 | h, ^
balanced market."
3 m* y9 o& R1 p T# W3 _! b' J" j8 t' ^+ g0 P! x
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
, l- a' v/ Z N6 A" X* s2 \2 Dconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 f" w3 R( Y6 V( ~- D( N( Z# K
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* M9 S/ V/ I: ^& P# i9 v6 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( F6 x3 [! x" C
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 D7 s8 w& _7 w/ mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record3 X j+ h; `! e' P
breaking price appreciations.. Y- P' V/ ~+ t; m/ s/ m2 p
A# _6 _# g0 }% h
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
% U; S6 Z! e3 ]) \/ jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
8 [" G6 R2 M g, O8 slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( k$ n7 O- K5 }: f0 P# Y
% }6 u! b# G8 D' v& V% K* N8 h. d
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 R4 a' u7 P4 T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* W* r# D/ @ M( j! G
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off! K; V- s2 L# J( i" r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" x0 R* g2 j6 v2 O) t4 L) VIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
3 P& E J" }' {: d7 ~greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, S8 [1 j- p2 t( a$ \
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 w; b1 F6 u2 _. @$ [/ U
: y) ~; I7 Q0 Q1 v e; C( V& v While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. q( P3 s( W2 k. P- c3 U7 v) y: y6 ?
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
# g$ u# {; l0 qfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" f" c# R7 [ X2 x( T4 y
are markedly different than those found in the United States.- S) T# u. }7 F! Q- r# \% x+ u$ f
! o0 z! s0 A6 L Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ Z, `' Q9 L, t+ \" U# \- T7 i
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% |$ A* K( Q" \4 t/ Y2 c
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ _; b2 \6 M v
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, ^/ j2 _ \, p' m ^affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the0 V- K- Q, g3 N( k0 M4 A: X: a
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" V) x' p( \0 n9 R$ o8 c
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization f) E, N$ C! k5 M$ O$ n8 x
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
0 x) I: N% ?, P: o. i5 F0 A& Z0 r2 S- q" `4 k. v
<<% O H, h* L9 b7 m, l
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, f$ V# H' ?8 y0 _& F >>/ X0 ]: V2 \+ P7 [' F
/ A( H" V# T- K% T9 \5 ^3 F
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in8 d% {) E ?6 {. t" i
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 u2 c; D0 r2 F5 V* U dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, |) V1 N4 k9 s3 {: H" C
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ U' g" ], V* y8 J" d8 D' `; K
renovations.
9 E2 p- D4 |2 u, z
l; F! s& j1 P9 X4 @ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
8 V$ Z" m% k5 W. wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' Q& L, p1 w5 t1 Q" ?5 Acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
, O' _3 g5 N5 YSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. H9 D/ F& a! U; X- _' @! g1 V7 T" m$ g) w+ @3 z/ K* U* D
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
/ S# m! y8 j5 Zslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) s. F# K1 M! i% Jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new: B* S9 ]( V2 o" l
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& l" e6 {. ]' V. V5 w& v# ?to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
" `2 D. L# \2 K. ^4 c, Sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ N: q1 G2 s* m# k! H8 e# x; w
6 D8 d( P6 v6 i In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
0 n7 e: s" }! v; s4 Gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their# E2 P/ @1 }/ h- `. Q# ~* w& S
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
: j. q. k3 g2 Q0 k0 G) Owas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' X7 ?: }$ Y& N% w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
' W0 `* {7 x9 J( \0 Z4 `4 obuyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ s, ^+ V2 u3 n. q) v6 w* K4 x" v7 j2 f, K0 _9 l9 i3 B
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 l6 e* s/ X Z3 K
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
% F% I+ u1 a4 [$ K# zpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,- a- p1 m% Z6 c" U1 M/ Z
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 b4 G9 V, W9 X& G# W9 dfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
5 }) e, T; D8 d* E" n
) G8 L+ P& q* w Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
7 s. s- d8 p, g: `! |! V& f" P( [prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory- K' e- d% U- a6 s- n, h) N
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
2 B9 @, G: U" X8 _7 N. ~( Zfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( K8 P2 u; i8 w4 [5 I7 ?+ N
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ @0 R. c) _) l x4 ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before0 @+ K0 G: [* `4 d D% U% U
making a purchase.* q# d, ?- T: O* A$ H2 x
" l5 N' A0 J, C( j/ [' Z# `
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 r" m# ]1 @+ G8 [9 W! z( F& B6 ^markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( i. e9 b! i' F* F# z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 [+ w/ O/ f8 c8 Ecentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: ^! G) k: r7 u2 Xattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& ~% U0 c" S& m9 ?
amenities.
% f& m# F0 d- P; S( \
% t+ b" `& h0 f% l7 T/ K; t The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 l, J+ I, f9 `" [! l
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand% }! N9 K0 h0 o4 }" L1 q
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 h! X% m& N ?# Jcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' E$ B+ b% n3 G$ [# [) j
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. `8 I/ ~' @8 c% D% S
residence, rather than for investment.1 Q0 p3 c- i5 z1 I! q4 Z
8 }$ c) @/ \) P( }% S- n
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as- m9 \ X1 p6 I; j9 f, g
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 ]8 c$ J. _# Z8 u, t {, X; e- W
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
0 M k6 G) ]1 x! S- I( O" Dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 S( K- W, T T9 @ j# I/ C* Rrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
( Y- F% t1 H- ithe market.6 o- H. z* ^4 f5 b% f$ b
8 }9 h, I2 j! j ^1 ]; g4 } J
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ Z+ y5 c( p' u0 s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 i! c# R2 v$ M% ?2 P* XAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring; Z J' s) }, J6 X& t( z
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( f C8 P( z) ^! Z9 H* cto the shortage of available inventory.
8 G% D/ N- c% p7 W% d: X: q5 D) s) g3 Z1 Z4 i. _( y6 m
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its/ C+ c9 q6 t4 }' f0 \. Y) |
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 _8 [, L/ I6 V
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: C. G% X7 q) ~# B" a# Qstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 y4 o U r8 r; K( [1 B% s8 [
9 {6 B! `9 v$ M7 H/ J
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: L+ G& F' N, r" k5 Y2 p
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
7 q) A; g ]' y4 [unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that) X8 u/ X4 }0 P2 ?) e6 d
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
z5 m# d9 k, n" Oprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer1 S& \" E8 ?& F4 O! \2 b& K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
+ H/ n& w0 O1 @ ^" X/ r. ybuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- Q, O1 X- t K' `6 p# q' W0 u4 u$ }" p; p d* |
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! y. @; \& _! K& w- ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
( n/ j! Y" c% N$ E# jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,. J2 a/ p, l5 o" d& C+ Q
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! e+ |. S, _3 d4 Y3 N5 lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 ~# y+ }9 X# Iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ Q0 D( M h; z+ ctowards the end of 2006.
% A% k" {# \9 ~( f0 R+ e+ C
3 S/ k" w3 o) M" p( Z `* QWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) L/ p! ^ O0 {inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
( { R" ?" G/ @* A( k7 h. gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse! t, T0 h2 N1 s9 C5 z
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( g; z7 a% [" [8 g6 D; I( Y3 H
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 i" M9 F7 z/ n4 E) epressure on tight inventory levels.
( f# h; S3 A1 @% |: z, Z" A" L( \+ z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic4 M2 n- B' _. M1 V6 p. C
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people" d8 V( b: p, h, |4 C
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# o* P+ I `# S1 s9 e
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; t/ ? t. o; C9 Q d2 [" S! Ifor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
9 O; l y! M0 t; h
: k! Q( M. `3 x' C( ~2 h D <<
, ~( _9 M1 L1 _: `3 x Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
M- x* ^' V5 D! g# i$ A/ r4 d' [: U9 ^& F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) `6 N' K1 V6 c Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey" x: j+ `0 z- h' `; h& a" @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# E4 n& ^) a- s! g7 I
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( Z- H- G/ I0 u3 l- ^5 R Market Average Average % Change Average Average; ^9 J' X3 d( _/ n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: J% Q0 U, n1 |- D Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
1 h% ]2 |" u: y& J- p4 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 G# K2 U: E' R3 q Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ K& ~( m: K6 [3 K3 k3 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* J" f( n8 W' ]( d) L' \
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0004 E8 b1 C/ B2 b' T0 j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; x' M) V ?, g' n0 V Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
3 l! f( `7 m! S! K! }6 Z0 l- }" \5 _: _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ A$ u5 o/ C$ C( d! Z% R1 k6 a- w, Z St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3334 d, ^8 s: b. N# Q) v$ \+ L8 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. R$ d8 {0 Z) X" O2 m3 V3 H+ W Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583: M s, T2 W5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 v2 q( P1 S% s
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1857 P$ F9 J1 K5 m: P. ]2 Z! h5 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! D5 v4 @* C) x m5 {5 z
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250, k4 I3 X7 C% x7 C* [. i1 R+ x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
b/ D: K; W, [! H Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& F& U" W+ O5 f/ F& [% ]/ V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, o' J" x) W9 [) T3 J& b* S
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707- ^, X2 n% F, I" ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 R1 B$ H u$ Z/ c- v Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
4 R9 @/ Q' i6 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 L- x1 r& ^4 t+ ?- d# P7 l# \% }
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
9 M/ G+ [2 Y, x# q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ @5 Y& Q& P' z2 ` Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' G2 Z1 F9 A$ q; e$ w$ V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 \& a4 A/ q( C" \* Z Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500/ C; j- h1 H0 y! t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
\' a$ M/ m k+ k Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
0 A/ p w8 S4 e; \$ L$ D- p -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 j/ E1 {, y( f2 d% a0 K
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8607 w" ?' t* P: u# j' N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ j) [- W% t& x0 x4 R6 R7 d6 i/ b* y- |0 p1 c. B
-------------------------------------------------------------3 D) ^- k# \. Z3 l7 d) j) k* o7 Q& ^
Standard Condominium; o( U' r8 e. r. U# [* A3 D4 `% p
-------------------------------------------------------------) _- p" n; H; C- o& ]9 n
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
" A0 b- G- [4 A g3 M Market % Change Average Average % Change N) ~# g8 z" v5 m5 J
-------------------------------------------------------------
' V& Q: L7 g- w3 ] Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%& |/ X: y% @ u! S1 @7 ~; l( k) ?( V
-------------------------------------------------------------/ B3 u9 y3 y* ` c& B# Z1 x7 P9 P
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. P" t, Y$ r! }8 O8 { -------------------------------------------------------------
+ I# T+ u/ n3 a- d' q, D1 w+ Q# z Moncton 4.9% - - N/A: d. R6 c; u3 Q9 d
-------------------------------------------------------------' [) f/ `. k3 H( S) G
Saint John N/A - - N/A
; |0 T7 O0 G1 N* @7 ]; o" r -------------------------------------------------------------$ o9 `5 A- j- f! T) h
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5% V, J k5 B( F$ q" w# K" e
-------------------------------------------------------------
! N+ g2 \. C! N+ W2 @; e& b7 i- U Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%$ U$ R% { z/ u. M
-------------------------------------------------------------7 n, d( H+ R# T/ q4 n9 c# A, J
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%" }) L3 p9 [; y( T
-------------------------------------------------------------
( \, d5 ~; O" d9 L/ t Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%0 Q8 ^/ z2 ~; A
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 C6 a: }5 u( |( {+ l2 b Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
& b4 f" l# ]. ]( ^! h -------------------------------------------------------------9 y* M+ [- P/ Z- u3 N l; c2 C5 @
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%4 P2 t7 @# \% `7 Z' y* Z* u
-------------------------------------------------------------4 @' L' e5 t" [" v3 d; U& i
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%% s5 E. T4 R' y. ^- \
------------------------------------------------------------- K( A( C8 z% C' y# U4 ]
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
' K% y* p& G. O1 S ]& @ -------------------------------------------------------------
* f5 D6 A( c1 h; O) F! t Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
* v+ L }) f) X; J. K0 F -------------------------------------------------------------
* D( x, @ `% w5 u2 m% `# q Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
- ^6 ^" l0 @; D! H9 t) J9 ^, i+ [ -------------------------------------------------------------9 w# M7 n9 A- {& U+ a# W9 W9 u
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%3 T9 u8 @9 t& H% ~* T
-------------------------------------------------------------" c, O, ?1 R# J* d" a5 w( P- g
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
: _ a' [$ J9 h" h; x x -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ~* ~' N& Z# i' I- b5 v >>
7 d4 c* w0 X2 i1 s- e
% Z2 v8 I& C4 @" H Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( T/ ~# c! ]! @) d7 }! \
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 f4 _4 L7 e+ S+ [1 ]3 u; Q# wJohn and Victoria.
, A9 X1 \- v( g. F5 D5 I4 p6 S" i4 [: j- ~* \# k
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
' o) ?7 W4 D6 Q7 C7 n' A/ Acomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of4 | d4 a7 G; s2 m! @7 F+ x8 _/ h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, z: O. y8 P6 Y8 D8 |4 P
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price, z& O) X" H$ r' G" r4 N
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
2 C7 X$ ^7 F m$ y6 s. Kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is4 C* O! I$ a3 k0 u- w
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current# e0 U7 G/ D" ~' h b
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 m- k1 E/ V T8 _% ~; ]version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
; M" D. ~& ~- }1 LNovember 15, 2006.
9 W- V: C9 l* C/ _% \% M, W7 O: i: e Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 |, ^3 c5 i( a! Z0 r9 _fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, L. f/ i" f+ T8 I8 aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ _3 P2 Q: L' `3 m, G
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|