 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
c# H9 C( u6 N: I+ u2 j* X% h. _7 h9 l9 N6 O/ n7 N& H
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
0 {2 r3 ^8 c0 u. R" y; u
/ x5 {$ r( A5 ]; q# G/ w TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market( s7 O$ u8 T6 R1 C- V
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. ]' \: w* c( e0 s# yquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
5 G' X, b8 e) yin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
4 i) j4 N1 V( @9 |$ E3 u6 o9 ]price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and# H" L3 E3 u- X( { H' d ]# ]: k
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
9 N0 n c* i4 N! V, R1 e9 h( A( F cQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* y2 r! y% E5 K' F8 n3 t' G- v1 o' d
LePage Real Estate Services.; e$ d' K3 D2 x* B7 J: x7 Z( a
: H- ^0 ` l- a- D! M2 K Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
% E% @, g {, s$ B3 T' Iare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ @$ ]- y& U! O; l% ]# J& H
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ O# J1 v2 S: C' osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. x* o7 G# |: a7 I
residential real estate sector.
( z) i& o/ D7 R
4 l. P2 Z9 o4 X+ u; w! e2 ? Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
- p0 e) o" _, @occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; B( K0 e5 J W# {year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562 ^( O& }9 B5 N6 a3 g6 R# T( A
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 z4 K; i3 N; S+ M: W$ P1 [7 H
(+13.2%)./ b" Z3 O! p; [) g, L
5 e2 g: S+ k! Q/ ^0 f "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth- f' ~3 a2 M4 i
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ n, X& j' r5 H/ y# s, }
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are/ ^9 o) L: d6 Z* R# g9 z
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper, C! R/ W5 O9 i0 }
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ x5 g. N s$ ]3 k) u3 o
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
+ j. x* P8 Y7 u) d% E x. qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ {# }; J1 {. G9 `2 y, b
balanced market."
1 d; {4 x+ H4 w: c. S6 H. ]
% v2 y; B* y' `' y+ V Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,% \1 F7 L2 i$ m1 X p8 l3 M9 ~, `
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift y6 N8 W0 Y8 d, [5 D: B) `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 u' W! d( c3 O# G5 q6 g# W+ e! g
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 H. h1 `! n [) C7 g, Q. X) w, X
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
- b' G" C2 ?; @0 S& Y& b1 u" A' jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record D( T, C7 S) R3 R5 [! n, k
breaking price appreciations.
5 B f" R5 t6 v5 V" w0 Q) J% U( C$ `; v3 j1 O; Y9 d; O
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: s" t" Q# a- Z, c8 ~4 Zeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the' H8 D- Z6 U- T' o% o8 t5 l
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) g$ f" o {1 L$ B
+ m9 L6 q! A* g% h6 \/ P) s6 l In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ q4 O$ n2 K5 `4 Feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 |! g) [! k: g0 ~, ^- r
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 b- ~ O# |: N% f, ^. B! l+ Gslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* H9 y3 s+ y# C% x( p* DIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
/ [; t g# f, e" Y/ E; l. Xgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 z$ J) c. X& c' I7 J* p( `7 e' R) |
price appreciation when compared with 2005.) |& k* n0 E5 Y% |
& c9 C2 C6 F; ^0 u
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
: Y- e5 b8 S7 J* Gmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and4 i9 B1 P9 p" a: F
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada6 b! [/ J% T% v9 M3 ]. S, l% L# Y
are markedly different than those found in the United States.* [" K; Y8 }, @
- h# }# y5 b: E' Z/ q3 U
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the# H7 e( g/ S2 N _
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
Y5 c1 `% ]1 [; |" x4 Vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the* M- O# F( Y( ^2 }5 e
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
# l, T, {! e& k' \6 N# X8 Z1 Q0 Iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
( I9 \! a% D3 S; C7 edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( c f( l7 E& [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 d0 p# h; C1 e
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
4 r* e1 Z" M, g8 e3 Z# r( w* N
0 G/ s- a% P# v* D- K [; j <<
8 r( d1 N& N; I REGIONAL SUMMARIES% X% J# A+ M* H7 R0 Q. w) Y3 j9 P
>>
% c+ [, s) w0 n6 v; ^0 ~& M' w4 G {% |: T
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
$ i; t6 \2 ? o- r7 p4 H& |5 a8 EHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! R$ s% K7 P5 l- E/ e
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; ~& [! `7 S) b; d
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
% L$ d4 l9 f8 {/ z) R3 t9 K& crenovations.) R* S! v' P# L H. t8 C
0 F7 P9 I" K" q2 c X: ~& m The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
( E3 H1 P" [0 `4 w9 d bincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
. v# z& H6 {( F) x) R8 X: J6 F& ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and4 n* ?0 p/ o' J8 r, L
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 {# G3 @+ h# `0 ^7 K
3 A. e4 [: Y; m, e; ~( ]% q ~$ ~$ r The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 e; @) a; n2 b8 |1 b/ a& e
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
, M0 P& t8 V% \quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& l) Y$ _) B( U$ ?& b, k% a( R600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
' l1 W* r" q6 }to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 c7 L1 { H: c( K5 S6 L4 H1 o- C
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.5 Z) H- q4 V1 h/ h; g$ ?3 Y, w
% d6 v v9 i" Z; P7 g
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced* T" `6 F ?2 |7 o* |$ F
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& `# |/ [0 ^. y# O9 a, }. z" m* thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 U0 c1 f1 T" ] A
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
9 i" T3 f2 z4 k( }, ?( x) Gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 B$ f4 l3 u# ^! g, x2 E7 ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.4 c9 `" k1 u. Y9 F! y3 |
9 F. e- `/ u% X* H) B6 X Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. I) n) \2 E, B' f0 e. N
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes/ |/ e( D- H! G* e/ H
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 v# e$ j8 S! ]
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, H' ?* A! }1 ]2 ufew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! D, y* v2 U, y5 q& H& x. O
$ k. g- r. b! f; B5 |
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
% w D" A& F$ a& M- o3 W3 J& ^prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
( K. R) n* g8 d2 q0 Qlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 ]. t# Q- m3 P3 Y7 h8 f
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
+ O0 Q) l# U+ G7 j! ?# c' Rwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the& z. U( A% k) E9 c _% E J v! _
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" L1 ^# ^7 N! {. i, x) @! n4 ~
making a purchase.) d. N6 Q2 |. k) h* x1 {: q: j1 t9 K
" Q/ U: `! ^; g; [" m, `
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
2 |8 p0 C, l" `- A6 L. u; wmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ p1 F5 x7 b+ Z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 b' [" ~! ]5 }9 z5 Tcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; e* w( c5 S: ^7 Q) |+ | mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 I0 f M6 Q7 u4 Q6 q% n5 x* uamenities.1 v& \+ T+ l: v0 y: H5 N% z* O; ]2 A
5 S* o5 x/ n; f0 B' `9 C4 x
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, x. U9 C' L" \5 O$ j5 m+ U9 F4 r: hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
7 h2 \; f) ]: Y, ^$ S; {5 ~9 f" h# V8 `across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 N D9 l: [ V% E/ [continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: c' Y" _3 q% n/ [( C( c
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; a- g; \4 @* G/ w; E3 d% q% zresidence, rather than for investment.
6 }9 v- k$ j7 T: d3 i6 j2 |
$ ~2 ^* N: A5 M) { The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 V# X$ m, n; @
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted! H, S' \' ]4 {5 c/ t1 i2 ]& w& a
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
; K" p# N6 A3 l, z# _# M* t- l9 wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization, C5 ?3 t/ P" M( _
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter8 M0 ~2 N& `( y5 ~+ \
the market.
/ Q( @- G2 F' o7 x9 j3 U. J, A7 ?- e9 M3 [4 w$ G9 m
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, I6 \7 Y1 Z4 K7 @% u' s, OJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
) V+ E8 z7 z4 J# a: }0 V3 { V6 _: LAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- E4 J+ g- T* m0 F' Umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 {2 B9 Y) V* v- D. S7 f" c7 @to the shortage of available inventory.: a' b* F3 u+ v" s- U, {4 ]1 ]: A U
- I0 X) B$ E' A% S5 X% p- C! V% { Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its: g5 C# H; O# t2 \" A4 h
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 x0 N5 Q1 N: N# @vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 \9 t0 `& X* {
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province. z, g8 U& w+ n4 Y4 ]/ r6 v/ K, k
5 ~( U/ O* d/ _7 O$ n( D
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
' T! I' S s0 B9 K" ^in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) N, M* B1 C+ d w5 M( c2 e% h
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ g" p6 h" a jpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring! w5 J$ d/ S; T! N" m
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( z; _' z3 O* a$ m7 Y3 z1 yseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 m. F# t: @% X$ f4 }buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity. ?; T: i& R6 m* s6 ?! V( h3 {
1 M9 M6 x7 W+ [: x- l) i
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ [. S) q4 S) e e2 v e$ _6 g$ uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" d! p' L7 o) w/ T0 n7 @3 _
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
4 f# k- S$ ]' X* R; a1 P" ]maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: _1 N# b& `/ X6 ]" Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) A8 R9 d/ A# E9 A* S
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly; b" T6 E- W1 O# s# [
towards the end of 2006. ! I/ x) u# M" d& c3 e5 l5 D- q' a
' M7 U- P5 p1 B, \While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! e, N& G5 r: n1 r
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
$ O& i W, T! v' g5 _+ M$ a$ S2 t8 oto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
" _& Z- o( M* @& [2 ]0 \group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# _/ Z e' ~& R( gforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 F1 n8 O- K. V8 x% e) Y6 }
pressure on tight inventory levels.
$ j1 h. B& D+ z' u2 a5 r2 o! t" p8 S- D+ ]. Z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& z$ x. x5 j6 ]2 a {
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% f2 \2 L, k' ^' d8 x1 q. r. H6 O
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( D' O% K2 [ P
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 K1 s4 Q( S6 x# P- ]5 `7 |+ }, nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; q* {/ b+ h' @. z
: K( t% i6 o+ W# g# C( N <<6 {, n0 d7 F. W9 O0 y, A# N$ S
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006( G1 N8 U" k( n6 v8 ]
$ @' m+ ~7 @# ]( m7 ?* ]' ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# J- [9 k7 C0 H. H* N" z$ @ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
4 Q9 c7 G+ C, [. v! b2 i: B5 \5 W$ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------, M/ O$ A$ R, I" T
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
) y! E2 j7 \; b2 C Market Average Average % Change Average Average& H, L& y9 D \+ f3 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) _, U9 h$ m) v: m& n Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0006 w. _" g: ~, F. m+ X! \1 Q9 ?0 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% d# v; v# m+ O
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000# W$ e2 C- R# U$ u1 p/ t. U. Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 ]* B6 x* z3 N! W/ z: T5 ~9 g, n Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( q3 N7 }+ m4 J8 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------. B* G& q$ e3 {( G4 i% G3 J
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
) M* M+ P% ~; {4 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------' L& U/ A- A/ Q2 p# H: N2 j
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333/ `/ F" Z% S- ]* A+ C8 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Q# c1 R0 f, C% z: [9 ?4 A1 N/ x Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583& T. [1 R% g: s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Y: [3 ?( J1 C) ^& w
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185* Z4 h3 @& Y! g& I/ [+ b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P' p% Q5 _ z$ k) X/ J Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
3 w! {. a0 ?, h$ m -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 p0 F# v# P( [+ }: g9 w) `
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
0 L- M" e' Z! i4 a% U -------------------------------------------------------------------------; H" w, p$ r4 e1 e% Z5 y7 T3 |
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: s7 m! r- w0 s' D* K6 V9 v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- `4 A% m% g6 |2 D; `) c3 L Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
+ B& _! |% Q6 d0 ]: ~$ e -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ]6 W2 L; ]! E6 j, V
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389" ~1 y) O! v4 F6 F4 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 Q4 G/ V* W; C
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714. t) o1 t0 t* h+ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 r5 g/ O9 U v. N6 O2 W4 f
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5002 g) r" R4 {; P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% \8 m3 C9 `, Z+ {
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
( l _% j- {6 L2 w( v -------------------------------------------------------------------------' d# d4 j0 p9 j
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. _/ f( F- ]& A! G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" h5 w% O/ B, X- N* n: `4 a8 y0 E1 z
( u/ S& I2 U+ w6 S -------------------------------------------------------------' ]4 t, _+ C# z* F$ d
Standard Condominium
9 K7 c4 @. Q5 v) w; D3 @6 B. u -------------------------------------------------------------
& k5 O# \' c3 v) L! M# a" q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo3 a- _8 |7 l: ]) K0 @" o
Market % Change Average Average % Change# z p) t/ D- _% j( @+ C% T( e
-------------------------------------------------------------0 r' `( C" T/ H$ m4 v$ S
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
8 B! O: Y; I( T -------------------------------------------------------------
: K! f. q3 T: A( c Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%! r6 }* D# |0 G0 G* `! a
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 {# d5 T" t$ [1 U1 p Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
& B: Y( N) X8 r6 y4 t8 J+ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
# j: g; @& } _# S) d ~' e* c Saint John N/A - - N/A
+ |- [5 o# j5 G: x J -------------------------------------------------------------; P, J$ ?5 x0 |5 H" F7 z
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
0 ~! c; V/ s, K! m L -------------------------------------------------------------
& L/ ~8 {# {+ m$ b: e5 L Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
3 p1 v. G$ k2 a) M -------------------------------------------------------------
* E6 c, e6 ~5 E$ G Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
3 b' u) c3 x$ w$ a -------------------------------------------------------------
9 k+ k, Q7 t" M Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
+ K. {; n& y8 P -------------------------------------------------------------& ?+ |& T( F0 X
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%& K2 K/ }, y8 T1 } _
-------------------------------------------------------------
- W3 b5 \" i( [7 k! {0 }; ~ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 Z: L4 V, f1 l8 E1 O8 B -------------------------------------------------------------
, v/ Y: r/ X- G' B5 z Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%+ W" T% w: ]" i" Q& B% ]2 }: J4 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 o) i& a' _$ g- M* K. j0 L Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%2 S$ ^9 r8 H3 |" O8 M
-------------------------------------------------------------( d& V( `2 C5 C4 _9 _4 e; s/ T! N m
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%, z- j/ ?5 D8 L. L: |- i" r2 L5 s# }
-------------------------------------------------------------
M: k1 b) v7 t. S& w+ B Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%/ l% h- V2 g) k4 Y. h
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ m' a* ?) o$ Y' K) f" G- Z Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 B& w2 p- a. z2 S/ V3 B -------------------------------------------------------------+ z% l9 U- n2 u' x
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%+ }' S3 M/ m" k N# B7 X
-------------------------------------------------------------+ y9 e, i, F, O4 O. c" T
>>
2 ^& y0 G, d5 g3 \5 J
7 s9 j0 Y$ o+ f& W* E, b8 D" p6 ? Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. _% B8 L! ?9 n+ f L
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint Q( H$ l- ~1 ~! J1 A8 l
John and Victoria.
J6 B- a+ m b$ ^# W8 |3 M4 a! ^! [2 A
! b. j7 r# N8 y* p The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 L" a! Z9 Z9 s* y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of% _: Z3 [0 a: J9 a3 I) s
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release j5 w C9 o- v. Z
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price. Z3 s! O& [0 s6 A! x' u! K! X
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 J, M4 K0 X% y# Z' R, {across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" q* N$ o$ p" E# Y3 r
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! g: C% C n$ t! M9 {0 R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 T& N# g( ?5 |+ R
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, r& b7 | Z% H4 G% j( S3 }
November 15, 2006.
8 `) E5 J0 ?* \ ^3 n# T Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 u7 O9 y" `& D& O5 G' f- E' Mfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
% ~1 k/ k' g6 b, W/ `! Xprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is7 w+ a4 L1 A3 U3 s/ `' @
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡