埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2263|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
# N( S, M3 t) Q7 Q2 N) P& B  \
9 }, {) O4 Y7 Y4 F+ L- {* @- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -- P8 q& {" f, @$ }" Z

8 ^  w$ {3 E& S7 q    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market3 B' _8 ]' G  ~, _
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third$ _. M% j' F$ c3 W
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
  d+ F  {5 Q( I/ Gin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# W5 p2 ]- _* l! bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
0 k; ^. B+ g) Omore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ T5 q( Q7 h& eQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% b+ R+ }: ^! H  U. {* _
LePage Real Estate Services." ?- x, m# j% i2 b" M- b& l/ l
& u+ D1 k) ^$ [9 N
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 v6 D0 b; i) [3 p: d/ E& oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 o* q' f# e2 ^+ y$ j  z: v
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 S; k( S$ h. s$ p( T( M0 E8 Dsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
7 Z" N: @% ?. g) Kresidential real estate sector.
" A  F( B3 I* F. |& Y2 E. M: m2 }3 U6 i- a
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# Y6 E: `& r% I$ F
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
: Q9 F6 f1 C6 R/ T8 yyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, ]+ o" g2 X; ]& M, t0 V(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
4 E, a2 z! z, V( l! z(+13.2%).
  e- R% X7 W; V
) N; n; V- S0 @7 X! k" w    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; V/ b' p4 M+ J1 W/ b; T. Z/ y& E2 }
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, L6 s# K5 O. D3 y" bfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# }. u! o# G) I1 O1 ?poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( N3 J/ q# o, ?6 R& `9 D! N1 hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* {' a. n4 f' J* D* h"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We  |2 u4 C" y2 |2 C7 C% P5 j7 r! l
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
# X! t  Z8 ^7 ?balanced market.") a. O% x' W, Z% m( a% p4 I" K
. y2 c) x9 b& n$ B, T7 s
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) N5 Q( z6 k$ N4 `' o/ iconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ S5 V. `! F+ W: \* k. Q
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 o" a4 s  p* U8 m3 i. h
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; l; N2 a) @% ^( c& k
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
% F. K7 f* R$ j/ Pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
4 }: j9 b. l" {6 i$ v& ]breaking price appreciations." O9 a: }! b( [5 \, I7 t

) P6 S8 R. Q) ^# Q2 N    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 e+ l1 w  G$ T4 S5 E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the2 G+ R3 X  h$ y
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 y5 [5 ^4 I6 o! ]" q% e8 W7 s6 a! ]1 M
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
' e! k7 m3 h) f$ t" N$ J! Geconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" A- P5 U8 t' N0 c
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 Q. ~, x6 K" t/ C0 Y, w3 `
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ n# `5 [1 ^) y- C0 b
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
9 S5 S7 H2 P# O8 X! |& H# mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 t3 D' N7 @* v: ?5 ~
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
  v" y# p0 \% d) L) H" P& ^
' L$ C# e" P' n* V: L( ?4 l: I    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 d2 D& P7 t+ X- f: x6 M: E; xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and/ _* H# \& C2 m
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ Z2 `- s- @% B! j- }are markedly different than those found in the United States./ C- Q/ M7 _. ~

3 c9 h3 ]  w, ^; ~    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the* L1 v: f/ Z. O& l( \
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's$ O0 `; k6 O7 u
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) d8 ^/ J& j: c4 Y
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 V3 W( @* c7 ]/ Z) F* saffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. q9 v, A1 A2 _2 \2 kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
& b' t5 u8 S/ H; [4 j, ^) h+ Naggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) x5 h; r5 a1 y/ ^8 Z# w0 T! Amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( c- b. w2 c0 F& t2 s, w
) s8 d  Z1 l* S/ U2 r1 Z    <<
+ h0 z( X: x) B# r7 V% P+ h                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 ]7 \# _# T+ m, f/ v
    >>  F  D+ e: O4 s% e$ [* T2 e( V7 }

! L$ Q6 R3 |; G6 W6 [5 k, e    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 `( T! o) }& ]& F9 q" D/ f6 S
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate& @$ o8 ]  P2 L# z/ u6 F5 v! P( L
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 w4 V' x: U6 ^
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- Z+ j6 z5 i# c/ O  O  D
renovations.( k3 w1 X) V, H  Y" Z) ?

9 Z6 O: F. a. a9 n    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& z0 L) R- U6 M
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 R0 p& D3 Y, Y4 @2 f3 ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 M% d& N* @" y$ r% ?, G/ m9 bSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" p: {" P9 S9 g4 B* _* l
7 o2 {5 E4 G0 A9 X    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 Z/ r' U1 ^' p) T& vslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 `. c' ^% T/ [0 |" c& Pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) g( V; X- I) F7 L0 o# T* m600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 ?! }; [, u& B! ~2 n  W. c2 ~4 u% L3 ]to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* ?" s9 }5 j0 F; Land are instead opting for more affordable housing options." L' |3 U2 i& B/ [) H7 d

$ p5 Y) @# n  p4 b' j" o    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 l# a2 R' J7 E
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
6 J. _; P7 B/ G0 ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers  r& R# g& S7 l8 m- M# f* i1 F
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ V& Q1 I' i" S5 S2 {
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: F% a! M/ E0 m* Z! Fbuyers with more options when looking for a home.- L4 B0 `; K. M/ C! M
% X! n' {4 k( ~8 l/ F! {6 D$ n
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 M; Q6 ?9 }7 f( v# r5 oamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes1 z+ t3 K9 X6 L' U: r7 j, `6 {, |, Y
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( s6 m0 d! c% }+ U
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last$ z, R) `; Y3 [& U0 p  d
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.  \. }3 O3 u6 A) g; \

2 s" _  e8 Y3 e- K2 \( x    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. w6 t3 j8 R% m" J+ J6 @; y7 R
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory; o/ x& l& c' a+ W& l
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting$ ~$ D$ L: z3 J2 t
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,  _# |1 f+ h0 ~
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the) G5 H3 }; {# C5 a" M
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) I; C; Y8 L. Z4 ]. x$ p
making a purchase.
6 q" D5 E# @7 F  `3 ^
0 {0 a- M; Q% N! J( c+ N! J5 Z9 Y    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing- P2 ~) A8 O9 o; ^# z0 p! S7 j9 b
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
' s+ a  `* `7 m* e2 mconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. S6 j2 b$ J) K+ E4 K( kcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' z/ p' j, Q  r! t- \. `attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 \, ?; h/ {! I2 K; ?amenities.
& o( P( \) R7 l& m& g* X& r
5 h9 [) \# S& h5 J9 j) I' t- _) j5 w    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
4 N3 C/ S% {" i+ _+ Jthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 L; ^; f0 v% G( V( V
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ t( F! q8 ]* g: {- Z4 Bcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 _& P. E4 o) t' N3 V
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle% W3 Q" t9 z4 b% P- z
residence, rather than for investment.; [0 n0 K/ h7 t

+ D$ k  r2 q+ {    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) N7 r: }+ q) Z: O; L2 _  X* v
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted" J9 ^2 e  H/ q; O9 m0 g
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 F% }* V/ A- f7 ~% l
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization8 ?: {  `  ]" d  Z
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' o; Z9 o$ Z/ c" M1 t2 D7 c( Qthe market.
( \8 X, p* T! T$ k$ d0 D' h1 N- y1 F6 z3 W+ N3 F9 E
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' @4 b' X% L4 t$ O
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& A# I. j5 V* M+ \: qAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% v5 l0 E4 `- G: H) X3 T' o/ [" f' k
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
9 _2 u) e, e0 {$ Yto the shortage of available inventory.3 J0 s, U+ v% ~' G' {' }* ?1 ^

3 e; R! y! e, l0 }    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its$ C/ f1 [! h, v) Q& }% H
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains5 H. F) t' Y/ J7 P" n" Z
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses) ?# \% M2 T9 K4 E
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 J7 D' C7 _( l4 [( L$ T$ I
* i! O7 A- O2 }4 M" E( }
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 E' r5 k7 m, R. nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ G. e. Q& l2 |/ `3 w' Xunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 {1 G; s% d6 c" N* {pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; }3 ~" @1 N1 g6 @& \5 c7 y
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer) d8 t3 Z/ x/ u# L( B3 J
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as6 @8 Z. _$ g: m6 ?
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. ~; d; c" C( O

+ L- D0 p- s/ i" ~5 R9 Q/ L    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
- s5 m- J# `4 \" z+ M. Q# m- r8 oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% E) Y" m8 D# C/ ~3 v8 e: k. S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( w* Z+ F# @/ W; h5 G9 b
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
7 h) B# n* l& h9 \2 ^1 g5 B$ |3 Kincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve0 Z" \; h2 P% k4 s- Y% X7 x* |2 {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly& u9 F* f5 f; S( Z
towards the end of 2006.
   
/ b9 A3 n. P7 v( V0 u
4 }! n1 I1 l  ?5 l- bWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
0 P- {) W0 M: u. [( q) minventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) @  ~6 ^1 l) ^& eto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 @; j& E* j  B2 o; tgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" v( ?% _# O0 D$ |; ^
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added5 E! K0 X' i5 C1 ?4 r, Y" K! w3 p
pressure on tight inventory levels.
  R" [( [. M7 [/ h( V6 J+ T
+ s: v. _$ I6 l1 ]0 S+ F+ G& n    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
- A7 `. o: p# _; t6 S; l1 W5 _fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" o9 T  Y( {' _! Sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
0 W% @1 T8 d9 {/ O9 z7 wwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching4 k1 T" l4 R0 h
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) Q  B7 O% a) R& L
, U8 \9 d, y# X. O; `
    <<( ~3 W+ q) I' T3 _8 z; q
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
7 u6 w2 Y0 K* n4 m  z9 V1 C* J6 n4 q' C% `% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 p* Y7 ~2 A1 r# v0 R# g                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey( c8 O  {" s( P7 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 C- q& P9 B; P( a8 J7 z
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
& b) K1 ~( h* y7 q    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
( ~4 {% V8 q  g- _; Y+ d: a/ J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  M: o. g: u6 z
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000* c4 I7 s3 ?3 N. ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }+ N. }- u* ]4 {2 h3 t    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
: N3 m7 D1 i; O/ v# H4 S) @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ q' U% o1 Z* c( |    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000: w: u6 X, j7 w" }  l2 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ G( `" D9 ^+ v7 `" A) p- l    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( h7 x; K1 J+ Y* w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ]% q: c/ r2 z( o! A) ?" q    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3334 ]) p9 P9 S# @1 t9 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. i+ h; O4 t- Z    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583& o. }8 e7 N" d6 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! U; Q6 _% o2 P( A& r
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
. r9 Y; M& |8 d( Q0 W7 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& P5 h: n+ [+ _1 z/ W. W% m    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
# E" J% [: M6 i  a7 L0 P; ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: {3 N$ ^  i9 Q- e  C, p    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
; b/ S! k) L  J" k0 |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ P- Q0 s; C2 f& |7 w/ C7 c$ h" q
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7071 O+ a7 |3 q( j" c+ O: c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 o! h& J  G0 S' l1 e% L+ S" V1 E+ U
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500; b! ?4 N) m2 {7 O1 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 a3 _+ W$ B9 O- _3 j8 o    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389* p, e, ]& @5 z" j# f+ t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y$ K! E6 k1 W. e/ K, G% U, M
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7144 ?; O3 K% G8 B  D  v9 K1 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 X' b5 l4 g, i
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500" o0 C1 ]$ A% S: c4 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ [) z  ?, R% M7 b7 @9 ~    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
" F5 ?; o$ ^( {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* g" d8 g2 f4 W- Z
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
# X: h/ q' f5 D' i3 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 }4 f# k; g/ ~- L1 W- D8 z
: V; K- F) v4 e$ Y+ R& b3 K+ c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. @- |$ e1 W! |& Z, N                               Standard Condominium
' s! n, E0 U4 E4 w    -------------------------------------------------------------
* S) s# I, d; a  T                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo! X' }/ D$ T: h- w
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
: ~2 j4 p, |" Z    -------------------------------------------------------------$ o& T9 Y8 ~& u8 H* v
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
# ]5 `& `2 C  K0 D# f& u/ L5 t    -------------------------------------------------------------
! j( U& t  D9 a2 Z# K    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%& h9 j1 y3 q1 x8 T/ {$ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------- ~/ s* f4 o0 h0 z4 Z0 e+ }
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) Z9 K; B* O5 s: [: @7 U    -------------------------------------------------------------. q- B3 E0 K5 o1 S$ r  g- C, F
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A" a. p& u0 f' e& C7 n5 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------% e6 G( J+ @0 d' u9 a# v4 j
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%2 q, h5 U" z' B+ y1 n3 J. z. {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. U+ x2 M+ q& O, {8 f* o2 Q* `    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
# m0 @3 o9 S, ^/ x" Q* w7 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------$ W1 H) x) D2 N2 s* o* p+ x
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
( |1 l! f2 Y8 t1 `+ G! Y- ?    -------------------------------------------------------------0 E* ?1 V( V: R0 i# r8 i. v
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%1 \+ b: o. i  Z. S, D* u7 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------. ?: ]+ t8 q0 _, Z# L
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%! @: |% Y8 l# y% s: I: G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 n( |1 F6 X* g3 G) b    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
, S: ]' a4 e/ l2 F    -------------------------------------------------------------* r; C( C/ r, F: h
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%# K6 g) {/ ^! x! x# u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 d& E/ q8 ?1 m% U/ `6 f    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
& s* A0 P; k$ f0 Y' P; B    -------------------------------------------------------------
; T0 d7 O0 s$ p; b+ X; E2 B6 k    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%4 g: p4 V( m" M; x9 f$ |& N; ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------( p* q: n+ s, A
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%8 t7 ^* Z' M; Z5 I5 v# c0 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 s7 T6 N( {0 T3 w9 x+ L2 `$ {
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%% z2 x8 `: T1 f8 J( W0 k9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 N+ Y$ n3 K$ U# `% C; [: d    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
- z) R5 @6 U3 p- p9 {0 q: A    -------------------------------------------------------------' _! r7 X; V0 f" u( w
    >>1 K* m0 @4 T+ ~, C3 F4 w, v: k
+ B' x$ O+ j- p4 S3 G
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
' s: Z, T; k+ N" Cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
0 H( O2 X+ L; h2 SJohn and Victoria.8 y( l3 M! i+ o4 `, l0 \

. @# C9 l7 L+ q+ b1 K3 U    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 \$ ]7 q# t1 K+ v
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 Q8 Z3 V1 @3 Ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release  i9 K% i, d0 X) k0 @& @
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 i! y# v' u, [9 \$ ~' j% p4 Ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
9 U  {. w9 @) `: J  X0 V3 racross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
- \; U6 W7 B$ a( i( c. tavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ N0 q5 |! P+ q' g- U, [figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
, a# l9 E) g0 Zversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) g) M0 J& B, r4 hNovember 15, 2006.
/ z& }( K. W0 W, o. A# {    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
  s( p' A- w6 ^: Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 F/ w' P0 C3 {
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 `+ v9 w, w' N8 tavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-18 02:00 , Processed in 0.107125 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表