 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 9 K e' q. s( `+ a' b0 b
: c4 S9 p8 O; |
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ m! g9 X: N( Q' o" E. a9 ]- y7 e6 q" U
: v5 R( V1 P* o- E0 _
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: S2 l: X U' ?- wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) Q. }8 S4 e; b! W) k9 K9 G5 R
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. r2 t0 x7 }2 Jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 v; o- E% b; eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 U5 X1 ]( R, t9 u8 h& [
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 L) ]9 m) b, ]. G
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal0 ~# h/ Q; @8 u3 _4 D
LePage Real Estate Services.7 ]6 e( ~4 p1 \) C2 ?3 k- E. k
! c1 Z% y% ^# p( F( G Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 J1 Q. v: h J) o+ |9 _0 J+ ware forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 j: _( g* ^0 P0 |+ R! Z
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( y# k0 c) H- E) n- @2 I# I& ^sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( R6 v- N; L3 \
residential real estate sector.3 u1 `: H# l ]' f& o# L
( k: g5 R. b( b: t8 v+ J0 H6 e5 c( B9 j
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
! [+ J7 K" {/ W/ c% xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)* J& h: W" Q( y7 n {( a& _6 s9 s0 ]
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
6 }0 d) f* j) M* G+ H(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
9 ?. Q" Y$ P ~. ~7 R, F' x8 w, L9 I(+13.2%).! l. ^' O& A' s
\7 T& X8 q) |9 L
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; i0 @8 B B+ v- Q8 u7 T& v" b8 e
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 N0 O4 O$ G3 y* j" w# W; [
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
6 Z1 u4 r5 c. s7 g$ J0 W0 }6 cpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
9 ~ O& a2 w3 U3 j+ lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ K, E; f; G$ I0 y4 i7 t1 @"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% \+ v& e2 m6 }, z! m: ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, l7 o1 L5 o5 v" d
balanced market."4 d, _% K& o% C! j6 F4 g
8 A" {$ L% h1 S# L( W Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ ?' N3 }2 P" C, H' X, X
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 H3 e/ m& z& F1 y( O5 f' mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
) W& s& w% J4 l3 k |- M0 Nthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" ]( g, v( n. W# R6 ?: v; L
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; e4 m3 u8 s6 n( b3 Dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 S }6 B) j/ f, ^7 ~: s' o0 A2 E* lbreaking price appreciations. C6 \* @& @: ~
! ~9 Q5 F, e8 e
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding6 i0 d7 _' l( f1 e
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
6 ]6 h; m# U! P: A# m, Zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. K& |/ r5 g# w
7 v+ S4 e5 o* {; p; F3 l# x In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid- d% a: |( G# C A3 ~8 s
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
: M8 T1 T+ O7 W4 g+ Rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 b( g; D+ i. P) o! d+ r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) U$ f( ]6 o( `In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers9 l2 k6 a: B8 b$ q" i
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of# s; z1 `) W: E, Z. {: E2 y1 h
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
! q' w) }* j& o$ s5 {# W% f3 O" A+ v9 P1 s8 i* Z
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
# l, u" F: w3 y. S& }! _market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% o/ f9 Y! Q1 t, S" V9 x A: K
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada) @" K7 Y8 }/ l$ L7 e) Y/ S
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 h" T* x/ @6 z1 A$ I/ Y* W
F- g8 ~+ P3 m5 [ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 q! S) d6 u8 h0 Q8 R$ RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's! ?2 o, ?" L" I/ s/ Q3 x V
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
0 ]; u$ T9 [) Brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general \* K+ V7 u/ K" A
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: F8 L3 \: z, D$ o, z# Edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 Y/ }7 _* c! F9 W& g: Saggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization& M5 i1 `4 W1 O6 S
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 q' t/ Q# ]; f' J1 @& N6 L
: W: {1 Y1 E# |' K) {0 J: Q6 Z8 U <<! D8 H3 l4 J! y0 K, e4 g0 r. l: z. ]: v
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. n) N0 X( z. ]' U, [+ y6 P >>% p! Z" h$ a7 P" d0 w& O
3 f* I( j! R; p$ m9 ?
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" E% c0 N. [2 a: p6 C/ e y, UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate ?1 h3 m( z5 Y- ~: M
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 z6 h8 _% {5 N. I' z8 G
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' c) q) S5 i" }7 W2 J4 f" w9 krenovations." e5 B: S2 k( F9 g6 ~
( w4 R8 p& D! Q7 \' Z; d" r! x The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
/ V6 M( z5 d/ b& Kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
) B% L, Q; M- W* R0 n# V- `compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and. x& N3 [: F6 S k
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., P( \ C6 l7 s' q7 O4 U0 Y
$ C, L7 i0 K. s# |9 o/ B% l4 M The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% G4 W- c2 }2 y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 v0 o/ Q7 f# }) y" b ?# g
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new F4 r/ p4 J8 H2 |: m: x0 I4 Q
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores; u, q! t/ S# d! H
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ h& ~5 J3 K, q' e0 @, p5 D8 e+ B
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
) E5 n: ~9 `7 z- T. ?7 m E. a3 }: V0 C
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' a3 F |* e/ X: Rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
% M5 \% s9 Y4 j% Y# H+ zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
! _+ d4 g3 Q# v3 m6 \* Gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 w4 F; d0 c' k' C
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
/ O- X& p4 }3 s }buyers with more options when looking for a home. A S2 C" \9 v, o6 b* r
3 q4 T G8 g7 u+ j/ z( _ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly( H0 s: h. B8 u; V9 K% M
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: }; I5 R3 ^8 c% F3 t, o/ Jpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ g$ S/ v. k+ U( Y5 U. Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
( O5 N) B R2 \+ G% cfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions./ X# X# W& N( S+ M& Y
4 \2 W9 s( E% c7 ^# z3 e e
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! b5 D$ \1 P5 U1 H" [prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 D& H$ q, a; ^0 j! y( Vlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& d* l2 Z C6 X/ U; z* [& qfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 N1 `+ ?. g: @- x, `; iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ U( M: A# e! [
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: r& g8 ^: ?; g
making a purchase.% G( g9 Q( x, H) R
4 `( Q% Y l6 y" h Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* r1 P7 M. W7 g9 [% Q% {
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* P4 Y" }; M6 J& h1 K$ ]confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, {! \: f. B$ G0 f( w, Q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 i2 w I" |, r, Q7 b# Kattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 x# s0 d; m+ u( `: i; ]' s$ Yamenities.
/ H# \. j' x3 J2 E' M! S5 G% s/ u% o% }: U R2 T g, _
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels. `# k$ R. l! S8 S, K
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand6 |2 o7 m/ z4 C/ a+ H3 U) {
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 _2 i7 H3 d8 ]
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* L# b! v- n' y/ v+ l9 ?9 r$ [
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" d; Y2 } {2 q; T) fresidence, rather than for investment.
/ @. f' U$ m4 D! C6 E/ |$ i6 i7 c5 ^& Q5 h1 P' V' s/ {1 _
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: P6 M2 x, V9 d h3 ]$ Nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ u/ r0 D* j* A9 |1 V
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer3 `( W7 Y) A% M5 v3 I# n3 U
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& x1 _' h9 u" d- i$ E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 S9 \9 Q7 T% [! othe market.& c' f$ C/ B0 ]8 p
. Y% o. N" i. k5 t3 P, O In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 {1 t `1 A* rJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% M; s, j) F5 c9 `5 _
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) \- V" g8 Q" B) s5 g E) ]months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
' v$ k# o! \0 d1 |7 q; bto the shortage of available inventory.# O( g% s1 i* w! X0 U
: o5 T( g5 j$ F0 K* S6 G
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" Z ]( W6 ~/ D7 I2 U$ }
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
$ u: o& x$ U s0 |vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- g' q; P8 `( cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! p3 A/ U6 `) ?, c& m. Q
+ F( w9 V' O3 t" W" t0 c Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ m8 q, b I, R2 z0 F- T" i. \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& ~7 U0 ~ }+ h+ p: Z0 G0 Z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 a" z$ t6 Y$ n5 x* ?' r# \pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring. i% K: `7 v' L; S$ e
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* q i+ f5 ?7 `$ G+ r6 d$ S
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
& L( o8 I2 Z, c7 }4 @8 f+ m! w0 dbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.4 j' m; {& Z! g9 m3 ]4 l/ k
! ^/ B, X* ^& `; U7 Y Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: b1 l& Y/ ]4 j0 d8 p& f5 q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% n7 n* R+ d: f
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,$ S9 _: d' Y4 r9 s/ W$ c
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
9 i8 H' m3 R$ `6 Y/ Fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 ?8 f+ e, X/ r
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( m6 p" S6 j+ I8 O5 R( r9 |towards the end of 2006.
4 R& W" U. v7 R. M
1 D) L( x% r1 Q9 l& g: {While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
3 k0 E; Q( U) b/ p) qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, |- H) I4 }; x2 R4 h ~to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
/ ?4 F/ ]% C: C5 D5 Wgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: O5 a8 s$ D1 Q6 t% R K" y: @0 n9 S
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
4 I4 e/ y2 a' C+ ~9 Rpressure on tight inventory levels.
0 j/ N6 ]! T% U7 Y( h, x% ?7 J- d4 b& H- _5 V& J6 `
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 ]# J* x# ^; r1 l% K7 Z4 ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" C4 L% s. f( M: k: A' k" m. Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;/ q2 H8 ~8 L, i8 j9 E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ }% v! d: j* p- b# V, hfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* ]! }, f& J+ s9 L' d! ]$ k0 s/ ?" F9 N. L4 P
<<
% c9 R2 p" e: m; o; o Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. h5 N+ e5 C. `! w" c7 U2 E# ]/ S8 W# J ^& }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# w- {& E" E# Q0 a+ J Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ J8 z* U3 Q/ v6 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------! u# L- Q- z0 ~5 s
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
8 P5 ~, j2 m' W' w; K0 J Market Average Average % Change Average Average
8 @5 N+ U# A; D; d -------------------------------------------------------------------------! U9 b9 _& Y/ H( c- p) g. |8 E
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000, m3 T1 M& q, {( o' g, x: l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' I4 I0 p8 U* V: w4 f
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
, ?) f7 Y: r( u% b9 D- K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; M2 K3 c- z* H- Y) H3 { Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0005 O4 D+ S m) t( K; N7 v! t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ t- Z6 L' I @3 ^/ u5 u
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -* z8 t5 ?+ ]% F3 ^$ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' ]! d) k% r, m! T
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
0 O, F( n5 K! o1 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: H% x( b) t' _ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
: ?- U( c9 A6 _, g -------------------------------------------------------------------------! T) g8 P7 B6 D- t Q3 x) D
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185% {8 A+ {0 J' e! m4 ]+ W' L: w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! X: S# v$ O& A Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
: u- {& _. Y% w! {& C: v) E* I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 b n+ P- \4 X; }; G9 | Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
2 c$ ?8 W; ~. q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: \; ]- M+ c! e/ O Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' \* }. `1 J3 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }7 y2 Z! `: @' N( C! R Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
/ l, i6 h4 H- W2 h1 e7 `. D: h -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ l" A) F9 A- V0 P# C* ^
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
- Z( `4 X, t! ?3 z7 D. a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
M* I! i$ l3 C- N6 u( l# m Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714; m! p5 i: W& U; Z/ j- H% c+ c1 [' O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) S% _! ~4 Q Z7 N3 ?
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5000 `4 y: j- {' Y( P! u* `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 X( Z6 o; ]3 [6 a- Q) F
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
6 o& L5 D& A! o! b8 t8 {& ~3 B( a -------------------------------------------------------------------------; ]9 V7 X# c" q! v& v) n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, C" n& s# B9 ~$ p -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 U# Y( N" A* q9 \% D
$ M% C1 [6 X6 u- I1 O5 i
-------------------------------------------------------------2 d6 e- S0 @( b2 @: p4 U/ `
Standard Condominium
( ? O! G! J, |6 _- _) w+ A" \ -------------------------------------------------------------7 c! M1 g7 p5 ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
, r) K4 l- m W/ T! h Market % Change Average Average % Change
# V+ `" d; `1 X8 Z* g, D% {# \: ^) M -------------------------------------------------------------
& }) U+ N; |4 h! Z2 p( n7 a Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%, f3 n& M8 `$ r+ h) [
-------------------------------------------------------------* N l# t6 m8 f) _9 c/ T! s
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" L9 a$ N; V6 n/ {" V5 h' R -------------------------------------------------------------- S! N% ` Z4 U5 Q# R \4 l( {9 k
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A6 w- V v- N9 H/ \4 r
-------------------------------------------------------------
# P; ~) G \- G7 S. t% z Saint John N/A - - N/A1 G1 Q3 k2 u( D* P/ `
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 y& P. o3 m9 g# `6 s+ A5 R9 m St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 R% w9 v; h+ T5 n5 T. B' @8 V -------------------------------------------------------------/ f; R4 W* K* I8 W f: o
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4% L& G6 p ?) a8 p8 W! N. T/ z
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ P$ B$ d! A g. p: K! h Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%! p: ?$ A; E5 k4 p5 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
) z. L" \2 w% S Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 V: ~/ }4 l( d; w$ j1 r1 x% z -------------------------------------------------------------) Y2 p! @$ l) v8 p
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ L* C3 V# G6 u3 |$ Y# x* C! | -------------------------------------------------------------
. H2 s* `7 \* h# j7 V+ d5 z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%" Q- N6 T% W8 ^( {' a% `
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 k" @4 Z: Q+ f! L# w) X Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
1 d; Y$ t0 T9 b4 Y- w -------------------------------------------------------------) X1 {9 J( ~1 U5 S" }* p0 O, s
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%4 P% l G3 v/ }: @; M
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 {1 L; p+ I7 s" L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%2 t% q6 P. i, r/ b* S
-------------------------------------------------------------- w$ `( u% u2 g# L* p
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
% f: e8 I: Y2 V- g -------------------------------------------------------------; l# L0 M# `7 w8 m( C0 P
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
# o3 i' A6 o/ `' Z6 J% B -------------------------------------------------------------
# a; l* f) ]4 X9 p+ K National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 E4 v# q, [( g9 N/ S2 T( Q
-------------------------------------------------------------% o4 |+ ^& z4 x- b+ n& ?
>>* i' b3 T0 u/ _6 f: D
" k8 b, }# j5 Q2 f* `/ N! Q
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 @. t9 _9 K$ ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
3 u; ~. g7 M% b9 E( NJohn and Victoria.
. |) ^! D( Z% U- N: M+ t1 ~, W7 y' v! w3 f
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
+ V$ E$ j l* y6 S. `comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
. U# h6 T# j" t5 a I2 a) ohousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! i* x! ~* H, I7 i* v8 I yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price S( ^" F) P0 n
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; o2 |- V# g& ?( }
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ p, m8 p+ l3 j0 Aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 ?+ p3 C: ]$ a
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& |1 L9 Y" |' W- @& K
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ B; w" j# ]5 f! W8 a+ t4 U# iNovember 15, 2006.
# I3 x8 d+ j% S2 @! R Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 T2 Y) w# C9 o/ M w, gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
& u+ k& p8 y- S5 ^provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is$ l; u1 Q4 U; [$ {
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|