 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 M( ]" D3 q3 z8 |, {
1 m9 ^3 ?4 J& T9 D$ V
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
1 x* p# w9 b5 h; ?- j- v. n
+ `8 H- l: P. J2 g TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% g |+ s0 _" C4 z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" G1 R# K. D( m' r' Z3 c
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
6 c) N9 M6 \( @; J& C2 E4 ^ a1 @in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ \; z" w1 q$ V! G5 f
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
D4 R# k7 w' N( Q1 [9 Y7 O' hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,9 `4 U8 [$ j- T4 I- m d* E
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
' G r5 h5 ~+ ]/ `7 r) O9 j( oLePage Real Estate Services.
8 x) z) Q! G, X. Q, f# G
- U+ F9 R, x* g1 f2 @8 Q Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters4 w+ h) {* a4 _2 B/ S2 U0 ^6 P
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) H6 W& x9 f6 F1 w6 L' F
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
4 A, b$ ~1 m- d; rsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
1 o0 [! Z- u8 e. s4 u% Lresidential real estate sector.
; D5 ~5 f2 E8 S# T' a# N
4 r) K5 }# S, n q0 F$ m2 O Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation8 Q0 \) K1 M" Z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ H: I" n3 i% G' o
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
' \7 N8 r+ J/ k(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 _3 H& O! F( m5 e+ O9 g9 x(+13.2%).
( G- d' w( m+ @' \9 Q z5 ~, G% L1 E5 u0 T$ b
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% K3 r9 v' Z7 @+ c, A5 nduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ F9 U' T0 L, l2 \3 r- S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
) A, R* e: {1 C9 v) e7 Spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
F7 }5 U. _: Cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* U+ z# p6 _- [6 R7 ]& C$ |"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 ]; o2 t" Z! O9 T& W% ^2 Mwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
( F* _, M& L+ A0 I2 C* hbalanced market."
" R% P1 T/ \0 q* i+ h/ s: ~4 K* m9 n) g
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,2 _1 Q( `( v! v$ d4 d2 l+ ]" V2 o6 S
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ a) ]- u1 e9 p3 H( Yto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( u( g9 B$ ?7 I6 t7 _( A( g
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& l, h8 ?/ x1 q) S. q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
% ?' @. p8 Y0 o1 ]! Z& d4 Bmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 P* Y$ Y& U/ W! m! Y1 G$ [breaking price appreciations.1 E# y8 d' L w% I. `! T( |8 E- j5 e
7 A9 m! Z3 q$ C7 r; X* g% _
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding d$ g* K, r* V# r
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
% t- o6 E1 G+ V. }) p: i0 Z% v3 Vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
$ ]6 J' C# L& Q) Z6 q3 a- \. J8 [8 o4 x6 f8 y# T( M
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 n$ L( Q/ @4 ~/ F g2 beconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
. ]" w( J! U8 T. Z' Xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, d0 r, o# f; C; P; V& J7 ^
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
; M8 p: o% k: B: z2 CIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* }+ g+ u3 z9 W' s( Cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ w+ ~$ ]7 f1 v0 g) Z6 lprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
; J9 c* B1 z; _/ k
) q V" L! q2 g `8 K While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ S d0 R- k) S0 o8 ]0 g0 R: z! l- rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
/ `/ {' c* r1 q- ]+ @% `( `financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. D1 b, o0 _" H& V4 x+ e
are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ M7 M: O1 C: k* w# |4 G
/ L6 C0 f3 v( `" D: L2 B
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ r; z# x: H! D7 YAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 f X9 M4 b- ]. E
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) R- R. M- a2 o2 Jrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general, j; `/ `8 [# p9 ^
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
; p7 `" i' s d0 L8 ]downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 f1 c. E7 }$ b. @aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* D2 A! |- M$ R
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."3 K2 A& w- U; s7 e
/ ]2 S1 T* A* r$ s' ? <<
5 v9 b9 A: {5 }. q8 J REGIONAL SUMMARIES
# l/ L2 s2 d% T$ X- ` >>8 T6 u2 ]! D# N2 B, l
1 g) f/ Q1 m# u# ^+ d# z7 n5 L3 O, J
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in+ [# D* I5 [+ {9 m4 M6 Z# D
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ o. g2 W( K3 b6 K, \
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% N( h9 r% A+ R( r S+ X9 Q1 ilooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ u# ^/ u: i# ^! u' Prenovations.5 l9 x1 o6 k% T: m; Z
: u$ f( j& ^2 L' _" G: G7 e( `
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; _5 E* U) q! U9 D: s9 d7 M# L
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation2 o- f2 L! u7 N5 F) ]0 x
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 O+ L, {! r8 C1 x
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" _. W: ^9 ]8 a; {; s) H- `' [2 a/ J9 G0 `; L
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 `, x7 r X& p1 T% I4 b9 u' nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ Q& i2 ]/ o# V) j/ f; W
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
# E, j2 Z: R$ ~600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 c/ V& V7 r6 f% ^/ A0 Kto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# {5 O* v3 h9 M" l+ Vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
* L) @) C5 p1 ^- W% X
& X. R) N) ]/ p8 g; z3 r In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% ~3 Y0 S3 j) W" | d; i
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their% Y- Q8 U0 Z M( G
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 a: F* k* J# F* Z6 C
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
0 i; b8 d* |1 @+ T3 _- tdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
4 E1 @' s- t3 b& c, o% ]7 S% ubuyers with more options when looking for a home.3 k# K4 u2 t4 {9 y/ B$ S
- s& }# p/ F# y. u
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
. a; O6 R1 M* m1 mamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 R8 @6 q+ _9 _2 X8 g1 `, Cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,, ]: B8 p5 W, n: l8 Q3 Y
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ |. b2 {: ?/ O) }, _
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.$ ~$ n) G: x! n! z) }- y b
. T# e4 t: W) B" k Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house) G& E; t8 I' D: V; t; G8 b+ e0 B
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ j0 X: I9 G0 f' k7 k
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
# L5 q: n3 b, Nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 H% m+ r! V5 f8 J5 H- Q! d6 N+ u$ Mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the" }1 @" N# V5 {% V/ Q2 V
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
1 x7 t& g0 z# z1 Omaking a purchase.
0 M6 E+ L0 V7 D. i! a
5 W! y$ M1 p1 ~4 t% k Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
* Q( C; U& y7 t7 y5 u) Q+ K9 ?0 smarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
3 O6 r5 i! r9 w, p2 g7 ]4 Cconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
4 o$ I) V, M0 h t9 Zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; F: ?, z: u0 u/ P( u! wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown; q$ B7 Y4 q9 s- p9 v
amenities.
' X3 X/ i5 D0 L% Z* w( m
# `1 J$ A9 m1 |* k9 W* M The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% h" x. q* O: R
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
3 X; b) R5 `& z J- r/ Q- Eacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has0 S* l: P# j, [
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
* z5 i) Q( l% {( E9 B8 P4 m2 rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
- R6 Y) f8 Z& J4 @0 wresidence, rather than for investment. M# x7 e# x9 K' B
% r$ [4 y- P1 @; ^; c' ? The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 u$ P( O' K( h5 \. E. n3 f
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
: L( n9 b, N9 X$ p! c. X1 h& Jin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( T8 J1 i5 v0 a$ Cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
F/ z- }1 y0 f2 D5 I4 V5 Drate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter: c. \- H/ y( |
the market.: S- g9 E& S3 P& G2 L
1 y2 y: m$ d9 w' O
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 s! r& K4 O% k/ n6 y. [
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
$ l ]1 W, d9 O1 R( r, CAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring6 c) K1 j5 C! ]6 B5 w, w
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due& x4 T4 K1 G. ]3 f9 C* c
to the shortage of available inventory./ a+ }$ ~5 N. V g0 t9 Z# D
; X8 V8 J' M+ y; n) k ]! } Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its# x' k/ ~ L) G- _
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
- w( t" C3 h( G% m: wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses6 G, W7 K4 d# [ S4 m. L( C
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 _/ J0 N3 m3 e1 P4 F2 ~
5 H* L& ^* G \, v3 y3 }* _ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
6 v5 v% A% }& k, `- l: iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ ?; r+ Q% p! d$ j
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 E2 |' c4 T6 l$ ^* c
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring/ D" o3 P3 T. y" [0 k
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
5 g4 r& B0 d; Z8 Y1 |season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 m: ]- ^, n5 R5 O+ ?% W! _- U9 a. c! obuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 F m/ G3 K' `4 X6 _# P
7 P6 S) R2 }! o# j. C/ e Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
% i1 v. S' J9 k5 k6 s4 v9 pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
% C. k3 Q0 D/ O# q! V; X$ [remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 \' G/ |$ u0 f8 a! L0 dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
* |& u7 z; y* b$ f4 i: q+ ^! ^/ Jincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 m7 q& C7 i- nin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. D4 n; I9 a1 X
towards the end of 2006.
+ y3 h$ W# Z7 T, U2 {, _: a8 ?6 y% R. N D6 F& \% u6 A! K
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
6 {4 M& S5 T' U4 P2 Y2 H8 u; Kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
8 W$ ]$ |9 z! Y ], @! k+ Ato meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 \( s. C4 W/ X8 O9 L2 i0 Rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 e3 k5 [, m) o4 |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added S: T2 a- A( M# ^, T& w
pressure on tight inventory levels.: M6 t- l# a% w1 S' Z
# h8 A+ t8 x% i* w! F
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ p0 K: _0 K- I8 G1 \/ C9 E
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' L; o7 i+ A, G' L+ kinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
Y. {% w6 R H6 z/ Ywhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
I, f7 a! v( f7 m4 ]! P0 p+ N$ Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.1 m# U+ T+ ]9 ~! p0 i* s3 N1 C
/ S' A( ]5 J9 U7 J. w+ U
<<
9 W! d U1 m+ @$ W* G9 X. X Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- f) S6 }9 t5 h1 K1 O' U1 q) D5 N; P, }$ e' j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
j4 Y- T* Q Q) S Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey% Q0 Z- x; I M1 d; D! ]" U' l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: u Y' ~- Z; T6 x* X 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 b4 h" F$ Z/ F3 ~& k* J. n2 A
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
6 E8 \; ]( v2 M8 c: a, c8 K% ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------& w+ H7 t! ]4 J% Z2 P1 }9 l
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0004 o1 v& H8 N6 M; E% y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& l2 x: s- B, H3 u Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
+ H! ?6 O. T/ B1 d; R. F6 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Q" k9 W2 y" k0 H Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( n* C8 y' W/ Q9 ]+ X+ H; K$ b8 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 h/ |# Q2 Z1 G6 \6 U Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -: [* ]; M; ?( d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 O o, X! _2 u+ W( i) \
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333) C" z% Q2 u# O3 F3 @( k9 {) y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 }. y( X4 P9 E; q Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
" ~6 E( h) {6 A; S -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 w+ Y0 z# w3 Z3 E7 i8 s8 B0 U8 R1 K
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
4 x& A" h' C0 f9 j' | -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 {& F& B' U% r+ `" k
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 x' \, Y; S8 ]0 X- J8 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------& L( }3 k" O6 L- J
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
; B" D4 O" B" J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 u1 a7 [/ k9 C. l& a8 d6 v' i Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707* V% @6 b! G; p0 L. J, a4 z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; \, R* s% @( y! n& {+ ?% S
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
3 J2 H. Q* D6 R* ^5 f6 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Z" T* F: X/ Z9 I! Q4 d$ ?
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
6 K' K4 C& ?: u' N! ]7 q8 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------( k- [8 q& ` p- P% e3 I
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
. q- [2 M/ i8 u0 B6 P, j" w! i3 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y% l/ Y- K6 x2 n Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
3 s3 c2 Y8 E- y$ y2 J2 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" B' m, f7 \# ]0 N2 k1 W- A Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
) e* E" L( b( B. t+ Z N* ^/ r. o -------------------------------------------------------------------------* @; ]" N' W) G9 U* X
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
7 g- S: p I6 S# R& Q! T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Z' V& B I$ |1 [! d; n6 |3 P4 e
9 b9 P. f3 e. a! n- i; Y: L8 b -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~* U7 \- C" }6 M, N Standard Condominium* r0 C6 S4 J" E, ~) @
-------------------------------------------------------------4 b1 s! t0 E: }! h5 E0 Y: S! S" t$ H
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* E; N6 F+ p9 ?' }! o. w% A Market % Change Average Average % Change$ {% C# E' T1 A: R5 B) u; o
-------------------------------------------------------------6 Z* o# [: Y4 q+ d
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
5 r: d; T7 ~! {& h2 }: u" s* i -------------------------------------------------------------$ R( l& {/ L2 I* B
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
! I4 Y( O6 i% Y -------------------------------------------------------------
7 B. e# s8 A" `$ ^6 w1 F Moncton 4.9% - - N/A3 A& x4 b) N a) `5 \
-------------------------------------------------------------: j* y# Y7 x- R5 l5 P" ~
Saint John N/A - - N/A
/ k) M1 J/ R# C2 G -------------------------------------------------------------( Q% ^" x& s2 y" H/ k& t
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
- Z9 G4 _0 z- n3 c' m6 N$ a1 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
, I( \ c' @3 C6 `9 n Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
0 w) U: J4 J, @ D -------------------------------------------------------------( L. z6 k5 X& f1 V- R! U
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%3 O. v1 K6 Y# \7 \
-------------------------------------------------------------; I$ E9 K- v& B; m' e
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%" Y/ `% w/ L( g# m2 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
! t+ d$ U$ H. P7 s1 X4 y Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ \+ W" G/ Y6 }* a4 s" U: Y0 f: _ -------------------------------------------------------------
8 h6 x4 a/ R/ z6 w R Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
* V( Z- t2 o4 j, `4 J0 B( [6 E0 g -------------------------------------------------------------1 T' R& r. \; s0 w: j
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
; D1 X0 K S8 N" Z4 ~- p) Z -------------------------------------------------------------
+ l1 ]: \! f# T: u Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%# g5 u0 y1 l4 x' k* u
-------------------------------------------------------------/ {" r9 C- _, h! U1 x/ p9 R6 j5 S P
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%+ A) b2 e0 o7 y' [8 B6 {
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 U" x! \7 M# {; b# i+ l/ a Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%4 T) B% j, B, N/ g% M) l4 m
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 m- T' L9 g* `8 P, b* U Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
, h3 X; T2 l5 U) G5 b -------------------------------------------------------------
1 _( ?3 \' b# p2 G National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
+ q5 J7 ?* i3 R. I* y) D7 E -------------------------------------------------------------/ b0 b* v$ I! U# f! L0 N
>>8 `4 R! a% q9 ^- r
) w: }3 B3 M) Z/ q) Z+ _# W% V" M, A$ r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
- P0 p( _' M, n$ b2 R7 U0 lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; H9 j* Y d5 [% t R+ W( IJohn and Victoria.
4 M* e; l4 S6 |
$ X" j: r1 A! |1 M9 ~& o The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: @- G. u7 B9 T x* w8 v2 G1 @8 l. rcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" e. q( o; f& S& rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- T' Q9 H+ S- c3 {; ireferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 W8 q- W- v% Y! `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 c( x" x! v' r( \2 X( Vacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ W, p- K# E, r# X0 s4 U) j. I8 z/ }
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ k% @ i- y. X P
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 [+ }% y# q1 ~9 m) w
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on% {! |& w3 x4 `9 V
November 15, 2006.
6 r5 |1 l, e/ I2 w: }3 D Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
1 Q3 W+ c8 R' K Y; M' d( ]5 |fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge& g6 C% ^# Z3 M" A) Q G
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- x1 N( z8 c. J" n& M8 s- [8 oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|