 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 ! Q t" \9 ~% P. E& w( [
* y" P: X& a6 s, g0 d4 V
. G4 j4 @8 D; \你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:- z, \8 T2 e% P9 f
Ralph Klein) j5 c5 Y! b( p! I/ c) Y! Y
- u' l3 N6 z6 e2 J( n8 d i
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
# k& Q! ^8 p9 q+ A3 [" s# Z2 ^4 |2 O7 h! F) Z1 D& ^7 z$ b
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
7 f8 h o. @0 n2 T" O6 C _9 n% u$ N' U+ x [: C# I
, i% {0 }2 o8 a* \) {; c, w- s! V G6 ^: e' f- T' j$ ~
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
$ n7 B' L6 d& ~9 NHistoric Alberta budget balances:2 O1 [* [, U( `) S5 a
( t9 q: E% L2 ?. Z) O1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
! x2 ~! b6 H/ `$ A" {! s; S, V c* A9 W4 P X
1982-83: $796 million deficit1 I' }0 r4 }/ r5 v& q
- A' l7 d; f ^4 ?! Q
1983-84: $129 million surplus
# b$ k8 R4 d$ W5 G7 }0 `, V+ w; C6 x2 c0 f$ `" a, d
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
, u9 B# H6 h4 U; B) R6 `6 s$ o# L0 k- v+ D4 S3 M& \% i; A
1985-86: $761 million deficit
4 Q7 _* x1 f% H
, [" R. L3 K% C; P1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit: T, E9 v5 `# \. X T
% k0 w2 v I4 g) b5 [
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit J0 l2 p& n, T3 Q2 |( i7 l2 _
# r; S! U Y! m# P
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit: J( L. }+ T5 i9 K6 W. J$ J
8 y! p6 \. T/ k7 R. ?3 P0 Z
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit5 |7 T# p2 b& N7 X [
1 G, @0 v7 P' t, {
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
" X, ^* s! H0 t3 Y/ E1 ]! y. C
, f& b6 i5 z' f" ^+ P! _/ z1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
+ a" `' k o" n: G1 o( o2 H7 ^5 q7 i) D/ O
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit( Y' e0 [: o" v N
& a0 A- n( S4 B0 d! W4 l% M1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
# o- x3 c9 H$ E: W& M) i& D! c5 t# j: R: G/ ^2 U* y! m& o
1994-95: $938 million surplus
- T% X: I z: ]3 P4 N4 s8 w% v9 v; \7 Q
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
- t1 \( d( d) J, X! V2 c O& v3 H* p+ z) E$ }
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus+ B5 \ T3 f; K0 d% a2 P
/ G5 W0 {* r1 o" J7 U# D1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus1 R$ h4 H' I* F
: \- Q3 @8 e7 {3 }' E1 `1 E/ c; i a, Y
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
$ m% t/ k7 ~ O
& i) l# Q, W9 U- q1 |. T" o1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
8 N8 K4 ^+ _# R' ~" ^+ ^- T3 u
4 n+ c$ W- E7 K, S; B J2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
- m8 D0 i5 y0 h [ I
1 _; d2 v4 r5 @# m2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
4 B. J: t. c: l# i6 c5 m$ q$ c/ O' Z. u( S) b. a
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus' v% D$ K9 k8 F' u) v1 {7 _4 H
+ n4 L/ N, e7 h" v. }1 ^
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
+ Q, `0 S- \9 n# g; Y9 ^, B$ d7 n0 H) ]
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
$ o* N- z6 V$ R7 ^0 ]# V5 @
& E m; d+ f0 y5 w9 ~8 [1 i2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
1 g2 b9 ^( z( Q3 @' a. p. K: p! k& R1 h* ~; R
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
; H- l4 ^% S; ]5 e+ p0 K, E
2 l9 T# n, t0 u# g8 ]6 N2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus0 G0 S% x) m3 r' M& ]
% t) d0 v! {2 J* r! f2008-09: $852 million deficit
2 _' A0 {4 S! ^. v4 b: O
, C2 ^: s. \& o) {2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit7 X1 G; [, ]) n% K7 H
' D ?: D7 l6 \; i o. Z6 U; \4 |- E
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
% t. @, q' M( ^
! ^6 l: k; m9 N3 z+ y4 j1 @$ m+ @8 ~1 K2011-12: $23 million deficit
Q) T/ u: H( @6 c# i+ O3 Q \4 Y/ T- `* g, w; D- X
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
P6 l) s+ H3 J0 G
r0 t8 r* g; u: p" X. O2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|