 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
/ s) A& ?6 Y! I0 |& E2 r; L
' P( \7 _; v7 ^5 Q5 [$ P2 A
# F+ u y& b: y! f% Z0 e8 a$ @$ @; |If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
8 {' D& c+ ^% o3 A# `" ? ^# I+ a, Z3 o& I) O8 L
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
. v0 q" X0 j% l. \! o6 h0 W5 k4 c1 ]* u; V
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..9 M( @7 G# s& C! N# z1 s: G
+ U1 m4 h% \& b3 O2 s
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ! ^% u" }/ i9 l& ^" U4 c
|
|