 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 , j+ t, z$ p2 K: U! ^ @$ m4 g
+ ]2 L! N) X, s4 j, _. S' U* j
3 C. H: M. k! [1 D+ U8 `( m
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
8 I9 x/ [" R: N4 {" u( `
: ?3 a1 f: s' `. [Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03! Y; R& Y7 ?( W' ^
+ t- c% I$ u& W6 I* v
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..) T X. [' P, B# Y V5 E2 _5 |; Z
- ^5 V5 h, {" M: v! [! r1 {7 N
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
% O* j! Y6 }/ x) X |
|