Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
. ^8 u/ o! d0 \2 NLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
9 m: b' n9 b8 A. ]! [2 ?
1 j  b# \. i/ c" ILeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
4 o: J- q4 g0 R5 E
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
9 g6 o: Q; g9 |% e/ _; t; ~
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
# M' E/ S9 a$ E2 r! x7 zSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
# t2 m- e; ]& `3 W7 x4 Q& _You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
! ?) J6 A% e/ R, n3 ?
" ]( c! h0 J+ H2 l' KIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

5 Z+ W, J0 B- O4 P( q8 \( k Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
! O/ f6 U! T9 B, \( d1 D! _1 |' q# ]+ K Avg. 1988-2000 2001
4 [. b( \1 `% ?# NBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
% u# r& y; z" |# ?6 fLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
# k% w6 |6 ?5 [Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
5 Q" o" w; h! t8 |New York  21.2 22.5
6 `0 D4 p2 h4 s/ xChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
1 D6 j+ G+ F9 O/ o! O. x
- l9 i) J) a) A" F3 X5 u7 K# L
$ M' p+ _/ m# `
/ a5 {  e6 Y% p3 [/ ^It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
5 L. w% h) u$ C
  w; S8 v2 `  J) }; c: ^
0 |$ ~% o2 I" ~From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

$ Z: W6 }8 u5 }% z$ hit would be a good reference.
* a2 k1 v: _/ d5 q8 Q5 u- J
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
2 A! F; W) I: {% I6 }
" t& t2 L4 J" N* L/ w, q! l[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]