Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
4 A% A. V8 p9 `' t: h
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
) D' [: {4 T4 [1 p7 X0 ~% P
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

! X4 H$ U1 Z1 B8 FSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
5 P4 Y% J9 i9 LSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
) `6 ^" i. `8 {" P/ e# R  ?You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
9 u4 e- v* M# p) C1 s, _8 k: @
9 P" y. ]6 z% H/ MIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
* s5 `* p7 p5 I! I$ }2 }! t
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
) n  J: e1 N4 L" [ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
, T; j% E) C* f: ~) }Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
( @0 ~' E7 D  y/ B# aSeattle  20.4 25
9 X+ P8 b- e; G5 `  k! ]+ |$ a9 YDenver  17.7 23.7
- E" b3 B& r# Z  E2 {* {New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
* D% }( O3 d) R& P; d) HWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4


& @, x$ k. n* F8 Q. A& @6 h
9 r# i1 r" i. LIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
( o! L; i9 J: E7 k  v, }, h3 Z

3 @. u' o" a( |5 j2 i5 `3 b6 _6 tFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
  }$ }; j+ G- J
it would be a good reference.

$ q. ?  a: D1 c  Q! v" Rthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

/ n2 [1 Q' z2 n* y6 Y, t! R[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]