Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
' I, A: a* m% |$ ]
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
5 n" I) U4 S: d% H3 i+ O
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 b1 x6 Z( f' A* T+ X# C# k
" o9 d/ R2 y  E4 u1 q! F' p/ ATo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
& J) f$ F% ]* n+ D# @, g/ z0 p, ^( {
- G# ^- R$ x: J
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
% x9 K& B2 t" ^9 H' f
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
8 F+ G  n) I+ g' E, s; W) `! dSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
) M' Q# ^+ h$ ?1 j8 r- ]" kNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
- e/ T0 W0 W, c$ yYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
! m2 U( M3 [. z; S% T5 ?7 P5 u4 r* o
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

- j9 |# q! J4 ^3 H& \ Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" X' {9 l6 M9 ?" g$ K! |- u1 q+ mBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
8 ]! w; k& [' xSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
, U: J3 v8 Z! ]" x- RNew York  21.2 22.5
! V8 s0 _% W- y5 T) uChicago  17.2 20.8
7 i$ Q- z2 r  W. R: yWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
8 m( ~# g9 D8 n) n4 Z: t


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
" L" J& H0 W- u2 G

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
3 t3 X3 l2 P% e3 N' \9 r
5 J/ Z9 W' _. B+ sit would be a good reference.

5 L' {' ^% n/ m, Y1 d( ithanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
, o/ T" f, V) z) M& C1 ^
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]