 鲜花( 27)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表 a" u# M) s5 v. Q: Q, S
为什么呢?北面的Twin Brooks不错,南面的Rutherford也可以,111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲,为啥就MacEwan不好呢?& r0 B a2 `2 {) K, D
- }% W$ a7 q% [
* b5 K% Y. R* {" s" B! Y0 u* s* sMacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago., U' ]5 O! P& u. Q& i! {
2 N+ Z( r, C5 X+ m, I5 J
Single house/total house rent house/total house
5 r; X4 B9 F/ [9 {1 h- K- cMacEwan 62% 17%
* c' O3 i( Y: x. x& @3 YRutherford 78% 4%
3 z7 E+ C% U: ?- I0 iTwin Brooks 85% 2% |
|