 鲜花( 27)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表/ U5 W I( V# h8 j/ M# d2 m
为什么呢?北面的Twin Brooks不错,南面的Rutherford也可以,111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲,为啥就MacEwan不好呢?
( ~, X# ]+ E) n& d- e! ^
( y/ D) }9 U! m/ [% y, n, N
# [" u* y+ u2 t1 kMacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago.% o, X/ u3 k' z
2 r( f3 c. I$ U. ~( q' a Single house/total house rent house/total house
/ |) Z0 n$ A: t* f; kMacEwan 62% 17%
; t% G3 ?/ c P& h( `- lRutherford 78% 4%" h0 W5 ^: a0 M9 Y, @4 A
Twin Brooks 85% 2% |
|