埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1278|回复: 16

Alberta doesn’t have a revenue problem, it has a spending addiction’

[复制链接]
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-28 12:35 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
赞成这段话:
" S" d" H1 J, n" _$ x+ m
  K* }" j  ?" P$ z4 P0 DCut government wages( Y$ v/ t5 @2 L. ?. x) P

1 I2 Q: ?: [4 B/ S$ EInstead of a sales tax, we should look to a 10% cut in all government employee wages and a careful review of all government-funded projects. If this isn’t enough, then we should cut until it is. If a sales tax is imposed, all the government needs to do is tweak it higher if they want more cash. Responsible citizens elected these people because they showed promise;let’s say “no” to a sales tax and show we have faith in our leaders by giving them a chance to make the tough decisions to manage our economy.
鲜花(33) 鸡蛋(53)
发表于 2015-1-28 13:20 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(19) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-28 13:22 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(72) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-28 21:50 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队 追求完美
本帖最后由 wendi_shen 于 2015-1-28 21:51 编辑
- v9 N5 o7 B, e6 R- D  Z- a) r8 Z- z# v: _* X
On Metro today, our mayor's income is around $21,000, our council salaries is around $11,000.
) O$ T) g- C/ g# W% Z; o: E9 r; L" u) s6 _
Mayor Iveson refuse to reduce their salaries because it will reduce public confidence.
# W) J: E' u5 @1 D0 k4 l- ]' @" H  c* ~- r8 b6 [0 R
What a joke!!
鲜花(5) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-29 02:26 | 显示全部楼层
But the premier had said that he could not fix the hole of $7 billion even if he fired all the government employees. Having all the employees who may draw from the public purse fired, then there would be no need to pay taxes at all. Right?
鲜花(332) 鸡蛋(23)
发表于 2015-1-29 08:43 | 显示全部楼层
farwestend 发表于 2015-1-29 02:26
; u: F% Q, ~4 R- G9 y& tBut the premier had said that he could not fix the hole of $7 billion even if he fired all the gover ...

8 d9 y  h' e4 x$ W4 @  h3 UThen let someone else be the premier.
' o1 {/ D) Z1 x& f$ b/ q& ?, {' |  d9 ?/ M
Ralph Klein didn't fire all the government employees back in 1994, and was still able to balance the budget in a $13~20/bbl era.
* t9 `* N) l' Q" \/ Q& a- R- d3 s7 t7 F) u& E7 d* W% C& Z$ u7 ~3 v# J
All he did was to cut ministries by 30% and salary by 5%.
鲜花(5) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-29 11:43 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
一盎司饭 发表于 2015-1-29 08:43
5 x# i6 t% a5 \( N% I+ @4 UThen let someone else be the premier.# o7 l# S1 f0 Z

+ z: j  ?4 [& Q* f- R/ s8 nRalph Klein didn't fire all the government employees back ...

* j# e5 R8 u: B+ g6 z  i1 {The impact of Ralph's cut is that a great number of government services were contracted out, and the government ends up paying more to buy those similar services at higher prices. The same thing happened to our gas and other utility bills. All the above said, there is inefficiency in the public sectors just as inefficiency can also be found in private sectors.
  ]2 j1 g; a1 w$ y! X
, b9 c; w% [* @6 x; x, WWatch out for this round of wage cut. I can anticipate that people will pay more user-based fees. For example, university tuition and fees will be going up.
鲜花(332) 鸡蛋(23)
发表于 2015-1-29 11:46 | 显示全部楼层
farwestend 发表于 2015-1-29 11:43
5 @$ V1 U" H0 O/ D+ EThe impact of Ralph's cut is that a great number of government services were contracted out, and t ...
0 N! T8 R0 N5 `8 m. b
Nothing wrong with contracting out. The worst and most expensive services are from public sector.
8 K4 F0 i- c/ B. Q$ X1 L2 v+ r: y5 o
We will be in much better shape if health care can be privatized.
鲜花(5) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2015-1-29 16:17 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
一盎司饭 发表于 2015-1-29 11:46
; }' J; }* Z9 m" D7 v4 [  }) YNothing wrong with contracting out. The worst and most expensive services are from public sector.
* U8 n' |! e1 W  a; Y7 w# w ...
9 \( j4 v/ M% {! Z
I kind of have to agree with your point that "we will be in much better shape if health care can be privatized" because I cannot find counter argument. Please try to make it happen. Also, don't forget to privatize education.
鲜花(776) 鸡蛋(24)
发表于 2015-1-29 16:31 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
本帖最后由 peterpan 于 2015-1-29 16:33 编辑
+ c/ r0 F! o9 P7 |* O3 m. L: _7 _+ z! f0 D7 e6 W# G
医疗私有化美国就是现成的例子啊,别人家的草地更绿些而矣: r" ^0 ?  }1 u& R) H. L' K
但是我不反对在公有的同时引入私有
鲜花(137) 鸡蛋(4)
发表于 2015-1-29 18:21 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
我不反对加税,全国就alberta没有。地税也可以适当提高。
鲜花(332) 鸡蛋(23)
发表于 2015-1-30 08:36 | 显示全部楼层
peterpan 发表于 2015-1-29 16:31
4 p5 U  L8 F! w& N' ~* a9 j医疗私有化美国就是现成的例子啊,别人家的草地更绿些而矣
7 q5 ], G4 ~1 @但是我不反对在公有的同时引入私有

8 i9 h7 R! Y: L' R( @9 P3 U0 f4 ]我跟你并无不同。想跟政府医疗的自然应该有权利继续跟。想跟私营的也应该有权利。竞争一下,民众受益。
# _% P; W* i- D- o9 W
* x# d8 U  C$ `; S5 }但现在的问题是政府医疗的人坚决反对任何私营竞争。因为他们知道自己没有竞争力。
鲜花(40) 鸡蛋(1)
发表于 2015-1-30 11:19 | 显示全部楼层
同言同羽 置业良晨
阿省省长周四宣布,他与内阁成员从周日起,全部减薪5%。
鲜花(122) 鸡蛋(1)
发表于 2015-1-30 12:06 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
一盎司饭 发表于 2015-1-30 08:36. W; h$ V# w! g+ e0 h3 \% b9 ~
我跟你并无不同。想跟政府医疗的自然应该有权利继续跟。想跟私营的也应该有权利。竞争一下,民众受益。3 z! l# I5 j- `' c& d+ i. D1 S1 n# i
...

" r6 w( y; D9 L6 u. h) g# R' {2 k. t错,跟有没有竞争力没半毛钱关系。私有化医疗系统绝对只是个政治问题,99%的加拿大人认为health care is an entitlement not a servive. Healthcare privatization is politically incorrect in canada and 永远是票房毒药。我倒是支持public and private mix, 在这方面alberta已经比其他省份走的远不少了,但你没看政客做事的时候还是半遮半掩的怕反对党炒作吗?
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(332) 鸡蛋(23)
发表于 2015-1-30 13:41 | 显示全部楼层
watercress 发表于 2015-1-30 12:06
1 H: s% H) M- q3 d错,跟有没有竞争力没半毛钱关系。私有化医疗系统绝对只是个政治问题,99%的加拿大人认为health care is  ...

) h6 r( h6 @8 ?4 E$ m, G炒作什么?反对党本身就是支持加入私营竞争的啊.
鲜花(122) 鸡蛋(1)
发表于 2015-1-30 14:39 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
一盎司饭 发表于 2015-1-30 13:41
8 x3 v- h, d! _4 \& K, G. T炒作什么?反对党本身就是支持加入私营竞争的啊.

3 A7 Z+ c2 t9 B" D; ]. E6 xAre we living in the same province?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-8-23 08:21 , Processed in 0.245107 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表