 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑
2 o3 g3 Z& b2 Y1 Y; P* |( w1 V2 ?) y P) d
+ [; V$ ~3 d4 o第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。, H3 J% m7 \7 O
纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
% r- Z' R( [' u8 c" J7 E梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。8 t1 y; k: r1 {1 {% T2 r+ R
梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
( q9 A9 W4 P( N梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。% ~9 ]7 t; y# Q+ J
' [) o# C6 _6 C' Q) K) z梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个
$ Y @8 }! W1 v' c% D) ~S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.5 w1 A) W+ I) \9 R# R# [( V
A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
+ J# N2 R' |$ R6 t% D, scriminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.* f! F4 }* O# W
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.0 w% T3 l* t) r' h
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
9 Z$ v5 K# p" ~& M# e最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。
9 p( U! O" t6 c7 y' d& l u2 D8 c7 j7 g) k- N: t$ |
如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
6 L8 `& @2 ^- T* t* B5 H你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。
8 V* f* g+ K y, R9 S: `4 N1 Y' ?8 b$ H, h) F; d, M
S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.% ?7 w# ~! n2 Y: x
A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:% l+ ^% R7 R4 C1 p% m
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
. _8 x; y- r- K1 ncauses the death of such person or of a third person; or
5 H Q$ C5 ^6 B M3 E/ u9 c 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
8 z- f: B% X7 O; u2 X. Ideath of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
5 U' y) h, \$ A" N/ Fnot constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
; H5 G' A* @! D1 \( F$ Gemotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
; C9 S$ t5 \) P/ s& B: m: v$ ssection 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
+ C( t3 |+ d+ ~- p1 x5 k$ R& g- h* vof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance) e: e$ h9 p {6 O
reducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be& e/ S- g: I S2 M: g+ q0 t
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
: l% g2 e/ h" I# h* F% U9 h4 |" l 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks8 z4 x2 _. t* j5 Q7 ?
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is. y9 N$ I( j5 C/ o
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or4 v. i7 x/ v& @& s! o
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
4 h% W- ?6 l! A# z9 G# Uinjury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly
, X3 w+ m+ I7 o$ Qengages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury3 M- W2 [ P) w
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.( g4 z8 y. o; g
Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.: L/ h& P9 B$ L0 h) ?
|
|